2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Cortisol Responses to Stress and Personality

Abstract: Although there is growing evidence of links between the cortisol stress response and personality, the nature of the relationships and the underlying mechanisms require further clarification. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between personality traits and cortisol responses to stress using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory five-factor model of personality. In total, 68 healthy adults, aged 18-30 years, completed the personality assessment and underwent a laboratory psychological stress … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
144
6
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(77 reference statements)
10
144
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, anxiety response scores were positively correlated with cortisol response levels in FHN subjects, but were negatively correlated in FHP subjects. It has been shown that mood and personality dimensions can influence cortisol responses to stress (Oswald et al, 2006). However, our subjects were healthy individuals without DSM-IV axis I diagnoses who did not differ on a comprehensive assessment of mood, anxiety, or personality dimensions at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, anxiety response scores were positively correlated with cortisol response levels in FHN subjects, but were negatively correlated in FHP subjects. It has been shown that mood and personality dimensions can influence cortisol responses to stress (Oswald et al, 2006). However, our subjects were healthy individuals without DSM-IV axis I diagnoses who did not differ on a comprehensive assessment of mood, anxiety, or personality dimensions at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional longitudinal models were used to test whether gender is an effect-modifier of race (i.e. whether the race effect on cortisol differed by gender) and also to adjust the race effect by years of education; income; anxiety measures that predicted hormone response with a P-value of <0.1; BDI-II scores; and NEO-PI-R neuroticism and extraversion scores (which our group has demonstrated to be predictive of cortisol responses to the TSST (Oswald et al, 2006). Furthermore, linear regression models were used to correlate the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for each hormone (cortisol, ACTH, and prolactin) with the change in the S-anxiety scores preand post-TSST for each race.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found racial differences in cortisol and ACTH response that were independent of socioeconomic status, which has been shown to influences the HPA axis (Brandtstadter et al, 1991;Cohen et al, 2006;Steptoe et al, 2003). We were also able to control for several potential psychological differences, namely anxiety, mood, and personality components, the latter of which we recently found to be associated with cortisol responses to psychological stress (Oswald et al, 2006). We also controlled for gender, another possible determinant of this stress response (Uhart et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, we calculated the mean between the residual scores of Day 1 and Day 2. Post-task peak cortisol and peak testosterone were identified as the highest between the two post-task cortisol and testosterone concentrations, respectively (for the use of a similar procedure, see BuskeKirschbaum et al 2003;Oswald et al 2006;Wust et al 2004) Delta cortisol and delta testosterone were calculated as the difference between the log-transformed post-task peak and baseline levels. The amount and pattern of hormone secretion during the test were assessed by calculating the Area Under the Curve with respect to Increase (AUC-I) (e.g., Fekedulegn et al 2007).…”
Section: Saliva Samples and Hormonal Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%