1992
DOI: 10.5006/1.3315985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between Conventional Pitting and Protection Potentials and a New, Unique Pitting Potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 shows the potentiodynamic anodic polarization curves of C-steel electrode in 1M H 2 SO 4 using different concentrations of NaCl at scan rate 1mVs -1 . The slow scan rate permits that the pitting initiation occurs at less positive potential [15]. It is clear from the results that in the concentration range of NaCl studied the metal does not exhibit an active-passive transition.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of C-steel To Pitting Corrosion By Chloride Ionsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…4 shows the potentiodynamic anodic polarization curves of C-steel electrode in 1M H 2 SO 4 using different concentrations of NaCl at scan rate 1mVs -1 . The slow scan rate permits that the pitting initiation occurs at less positive potential [15]. It is clear from the results that in the concentration range of NaCl studied the metal does not exhibit an active-passive transition.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of C-steel To Pitting Corrosion By Chloride Ionsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Its apparent dependence on experimental parameters [7][8][9][10] led to its abandonment for many years as it was seen as not being a reliable material property. Extensive work from several groups [11][12][13][14][15][16] showed that when a sufficiently large anodic charge was passed during localized corrosion, the repassivation potential attains a value which is independent of charge passed for pit growth. Sridhar et al [15] demonstrated via extremely longterm (>5 years) potentiostatic tests that this plateau potential serves as an excellent lower bound for pitting corrosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Thompson and Syrett have suggested that the highest observed repassivation potential is the critical potential in pitting. 8 They indicated that this value is associated with repassivation of very small pits, and is close to the lowest observed value of pitting potential. No means was suggested, however, for accurate and reproducible determination of this critical potential.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2 may be considered to be critical potentials of the sort described by Thompson and Syrett. 8 A pit of a given size will only grow in a stable fashion if the potential is above the E R for a pit of that size, because only then is the pit current density sufficiently large to maintain the critical concentration for a pit of that size. The lowest potential for pit initiation may be the critical potential corresponding to the size of the initial defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%