Relationship between Construction Safety and Quality Performance

Abstract

It is well established that the project cost, quality, safety, and duration are the four critical elements that contribute to project success. Past literature has established theoretical relationships between construction safety and quality on the basis of opinions of industry experts. This is the first empirical inquiry into the relationship between safety and quality, testing the null hypothesis that there is no statistical relationship among quality performance indicators and safety performance indicators. To test this hypothesis, empirical data were collected from 32 building construction projects, ranging in scope from $50,000 to $300 million dollars. Several quality metrics (e.g., cost of rework per $1M project scope and rate of rework per 200,000 worker-hours) were used as predictor variables and first aid and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recordable injury rates were used as response variables. Linear regressions among the predictor and response variables showed that there are two statistically significant relationships: the OSHA recordable injury rate is positively correlated to rework (r 2 ¼ 0.968; p-value ¼ 0.032) and the first aid rate is positively correlated to number of defects (r 2 ¼ 0.548; p-value ¼ 0.009).To understand why these relationships exist and to identify specific strategies that promote both safety and quality, open-ended interviews were conducted with project managers. These individuals indicated that the most compelling reason for the strong positive correlation between rework and injuries is the fact that rework involves demolition, schedule pressure, and unstable work processes. They also noted that devoting resources to preplanning, allowing the necessary time to complete tasks correctly the first time, encouraging leadership at the workface, and encouraging workers to take pride in their work are all strategies that promote both safety and quality. individual papers. This paper is part of the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, © ASCE, ISSN 0733-9364/04013003 (10)/$25.00. © ASCE 04013003-1 J. Constr. Eng. Manage. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2013.139. Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Curtin Univ of Technology 2009 on 04/21/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. © ASCE 04013003-2 J. Constr. Eng. Manage. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2013.139. Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Curtin Univ of Technology 2009 on 04/21/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. © ASCE 04013003-10 J. Constr. Eng. Manage. J. Constr. Eng. Manage.

Factors Affecting Rework Costs in Construction

“…Rework is an endemic problem in building projects, and can have an adverse impact on the performance (CII, 2001;Hwang et al, 2009;Love et al, 2009;Love et al 2010, Wanberg et al, 2013Love et al 2015) of construction and engineering projects. On average, rework contributes to 52% of the total cost growth that is incurred, and can increase the schedule overrun by 22% (Love, 2002).…”

Enhancing Safety Performance by Recognizing the Role of Perceived Management Commitment to Safety in the Jordanian Healthcare Industry: Conceptual Framework

“…However, previous studies confirmed that there is a relation between quality and safety as work-related outcomes (Wanberg et al, 2013).…”

Relationship Between Leadership and Commitment with Quality Performance on U-Th-REE Processing Pilot Plant Construction in BATAN

“…Quality, in its simplest form, can be defined as: 'meeting the customer's expectations, ' or 'compliance with customer's specification [3]. In the literature review, it is found that the primary indicators of construction quality are percent cost of rework and rate of construction defects [4]. On the basis of a comprehensive literature review, the reported several measures of rework are errors, omissions, failures, damage, and change orders throughout the procurement process [5].…”