2021
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021011323
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between clone metrics and clinical outcome in clonal cytopenia

Abstract: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is associated with an increased risk of developing a myeloid neoplasm with myelodysplasia (MN). To identify the features of the mutant clone(s) that are associated with clinical phenotype and progression, we studied the following cohorts of individuals: 311 patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS), 532 community-dwelling individuals without hematologic phenotype (n=355) or with unexplained anemia (n=177), and 592 patients with o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence of clonality in patients with otherwise unexplained cytopenia, impart a 17–27% risk of developing a subsequent myeloid neoplasm [ 9 11 ]. However, these studies did not assess the impact of prior DNA-damaging therapies, which is one of the strongest known risk factors for myeloid neoplasms [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evidence of clonality in patients with otherwise unexplained cytopenia, impart a 17–27% risk of developing a subsequent myeloid neoplasm [ 9 11 ]. However, these studies did not assess the impact of prior DNA-damaging therapies, which is one of the strongest known risk factors for myeloid neoplasms [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studying t-MN patients, we encountered patients who had received DNA-damaging therapy and developed unexplained cytopenia with clonal abnormality, without morphological evidence of a myeloid neoplasm (i.e., CCUS). As a vast majority of patients in the CHIP, ICUS, or CCUS cohorts did not receive prior DNA-damaging therapies [ 2 , 9 11 ], the significance of CCUS following such therapies and its outcomes is not known. We hypothesized that clonal cytopenia following DNA-damaging therapy (therapy-related clonal cytopenia or t-CC) is a distinct entity from the WHO-defined t-MN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For specific mutational patterns involving mutations in splicing factor genes (e.g., SF3B1 , SRSF2 , or U2AF1 ) and/or multiple mutations, the progression risk of CCUS is ~20% per year [ 32 ]. Further studies confirmed the utility of specific mutational patterns and clonal metrics to define high-risk CCUS [ 34 ]. In contrast, the risk of progression is moderate if only a single mutation in the epigenetic modifier DNMT3A is observed [ 34 ].…”
Section: Chip and Hematologic Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further studies confirmed the utility of specific mutational patterns and clonal metrics to define high-risk CCUS [ 34 ]. In contrast, the risk of progression is moderate if only a single mutation in the epigenetic modifier DNMT3A is observed [ 34 ]. In a study on persons aged ≥ 80 years, the clinical course of patients with high-risk CCUS was indistinguishable from that of overt myeloid neoplasms [ 35 ].…”
Section: Chip and Hematologic Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Individuals with CCUS have a high probability of progression to hematologic malignancy, particularly MN, compared with individuals with cytopenias but no evidence of CH (5- and 10-year cumulative probability of progression: 82% vs. 9% and 95% vs. 9%, respectively) ( 49 ). Similar to CH, individuals with CCUS bearing only isolated DNMT3A mutations have a lower risk of progression to MN whereas individuals harboring TET2 , ASXL1 , TP53 , and spliceosome mutations have higher risks of MN ( 50 ).…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%