2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05470.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between body composition, blood volume and maximal oxygen uptake

Abstract: SummaryIt has long been known that body mass and, more specifically, lean body mass are strongly correlated with maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) in man and animals. However, there are no data to date describing this phenomenon in the horse. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between body composition and VO 2max in the horse. Twenty-three healthy and unfit Standardbred mares performed an incremental exercise test (GXT) to measure VO 2max . Rump fat thickness (RTH), a measure of fat coveri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study,. an analysis of residuals (18) indicated that BM was the primary variable impacting sprint performance and fat (%fat or fat mass) was not an independent contributor; in agreement with previous assessments (11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, in the present study,. an analysis of residuals (18) indicated that BM was the primary variable impacting sprint performance and fat (%fat or fat mass) was not an independent contributor; in agreement with previous assessments (11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this study, changes in BCS provided a valid, linear method for the determination of the highly variable, total somatic soft tissue content (2.8% of recEBM/BCS point; or 3.5% of live BM/BCS point). For lean animals, non‐WAT soft tissues (largely skeletal muscle) comprised ∼40% live BM (∼50% recEBM), less than reported for racing breeds (53–57% live BM, Kearns et al . 2002b), which probably reflected differences in breed and/or fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…BCS was assessed monthly, on a scale of 1–5, from manual palpation of the fat cover and a visual appraisal of selected areas (Martin‐Rosset et al., 2008). Rump fat thickness was measured by B‐mode ultrasonography (Aloka SSD‐prosound 2) and used to calculate percentage of fat as previously described (Kearns et al., 2001, 2002a,b,c, 2006). The site was determined by placing the probe over the rump approximately 5 cm lateral from the midline at the centre of the pelvic bone (Westervelt et al., 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%