1992
DOI: 10.1108/eb028188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between Annual Report Readability and Corporate Financial Performance

Abstract: Annual financial reports, which all public corporations are legally required to publish, are the convential means of communication between managers of a firm (who act as agents) and the stockholders (owners) of the firm (who are the principals). These financial reports are also of great interest to other stakeholders in the firm, namely the employees of the firm, its suppliers, customers, bondholders, the investment community, and society at large. Through annual financial reports, management can disseminate i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adelberg, 1979;Subramanian et al, 1993;Courtis, 1998Courtis, , 2004Li, 2006) where as others failed to find such relation (e.g. Courtis, 1986Courtis, , 1995Baker & Kare, 1992;Clatworthy & Jones, 2001;Rutherford, 2003).…”
Section: Motivations For Impression Managementmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Adelberg, 1979;Subramanian et al, 1993;Courtis, 1998Courtis, , 2004Li, 2006) where as others failed to find such relation (e.g. Courtis, 1986Courtis, , 1995Baker & Kare, 1992;Clatworthy & Jones, 2001;Rutherford, 2003).…”
Section: Motivations For Impression Managementmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Readability formulae provide a quantitative way to predict how readable a target audience find a text to be (Courtis, 1986; Eugene Baker and Kare, 1992; Jones and Shoemaker, 1994; Klare, 1974). Readability has been used in communication, psychology and education to indicate how easy it is to understand a piece of writing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, despite criticism, readability measures are still widely used and recommended for readability studies due to it being an objective test, its ease of use, its understandability and because it can be used to compare readability of different texts (Clatworthy and Jones, 2001; Courtis, 1998; Eugene Baker and Kare, 1992; Klare, 1974). Courtis and Hassan (2002) also found it to be cost-effective and, as stated by Subramanian et al (1993), it does not need human participation, therefore issues such as selection validity threats are eliminated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early studies were primarily based on manual coding. Clatworthy and Jones ͑2001͒ review prior readability studies on annual reports ͑Pashalian and Crissy 1952; Soper and Dolphin 1964;Smith and Smith 1971;Still 1972;Dolphin and Wagley 1977;Healy 1977; Barnett and Leoffler 1979;Holley and Early 1980;Courtis 1986;Jones 1988;Schroeder and Gibson 1990;Taffler 1992a, 1992b;Baker and Kare 1992;Courtis 1995a;1995b and find them to have small sample sizes that range between 18 and 120 documents. Costly manual coding of hard copies apparently precludes large samples.…”
Section: Readability Research In Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%