2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between alirocumab, PCSK9 and LDL-C levels: results from the odyssey mono phase 3 trial of alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase II trials demonstrated that as monotherapy, alirocumab can reduce LDL-C as much as intensive statin treatment [ 64 ]. The phase III, double-blind, double-dummy ODYSSEY-MONO trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of alirocumab as monotherapy in comparison with ezetimibe, over 24 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and moderate cardiovascular risk, not otherwise receiving statins or other lipid-lowering therapy [ 65 ]. A total of 103 patients with LDL-C 2.6–4.9 mmol L −1 (100–190 mg dL −1 ), and 1–5 % 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular events (estimated via the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE] tool) were randomised to receive either ezetimibe 10 mg or alirocumab, with the aim to achieve target HDL-C using the minimum effective dose of anti-PCSK9 antibody.…”
Section: Pcsk9 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase II trials demonstrated that as monotherapy, alirocumab can reduce LDL-C as much as intensive statin treatment [ 64 ]. The phase III, double-blind, double-dummy ODYSSEY-MONO trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of alirocumab as monotherapy in comparison with ezetimibe, over 24 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and moderate cardiovascular risk, not otherwise receiving statins or other lipid-lowering therapy [ 65 ]. A total of 103 patients with LDL-C 2.6–4.9 mmol L −1 (100–190 mg dL −1 ), and 1–5 % 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular events (estimated via the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE] tool) were randomised to receive either ezetimibe 10 mg or alirocumab, with the aim to achieve target HDL-C using the minimum effective dose of anti-PCSK9 antibody.…”
Section: Pcsk9 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics between a single alirocumab 75 mg dose, free PCSK9, and LDL-C observed in this study at each injection site are in agreement with the findings of a single ascending dose study in healthy subjects in which a SC injection of alirocumab into the abdomen resulted in reductions in free PCSK9 levels within 3 days of dosing and peak reductions in LDL-C 8–15 days after dosing 7 , 8 . Additionally, in a Phase 3 monotherapy study, alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks produced sustained LDL-C reductions over 12 weeks of treatment (least square mean reduction of 53.2% from baseline at Week 12) 9 , 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower dose of alirocumab, 75 mg, was able to lower LDL-C to \1.81 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), 47.2 % lower than baseline, and was comparable to, or better than, ezetimibe [196]. Patients with higher baseline values of LDL-C required uptitration to the higher, 150 mg dose of alirocumab [197].…”
Section: Monoclonal Antibodies To Proproteinmentioning
confidence: 92%