Relationship-based Practice Revisited

Bryan, Agnes; Hingley‐Jones, Helen; Ruch, Gillian

doi:10.1080/02650533.2016.1215978

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature provides evidence of the importance of relationship-based practice over a longer period of time with recurrent support for parents with learning disabilities to achieve positive outcomes (MacIntyre and Tarleton and Turney, 2020;McGaw and Newman, 2005). However, concerns over austerity measures and the impact of political changes such as Brexit have led commentators to consider the challenges to relationship-based practice in the current context (Bryan et al, 2016). The same authors suggested that austerity measures have brought with them less staff, less time and less resources to provide support to service users including parents with learning disabilities alongside fewer opportunities for education and training for staff.…”

Section: Development Of Relationship-based Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Commentary on “What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography”

MacIntyre

Stewart

2021

TLDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on Pytlowana and Stenfert Kroese’s article on the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities by exploring challenges and good practice in this area. Design/methodology/approach Key areas of practice were identified for further exploration by drawing on research studies with parents with learning disabilities. Findings While there is growing evidence of good practice around working with parents with learning disabilities, a number of challenges around communication and relationship-based practice remain. The paper recommends further training and education for those working in this complex area of practice. Originality/value The paper adds value by bringing together evidence from across a number of studies to highlight good practice.

show abstract

Section: Development Of Relationship-based Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Commentary on “What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography”

MacIntyre

Stewart

2021

TLDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In light of this need, and the changing landscape of child protection in response to EFH, we develop an analytical framework to explore how contemporary approaches to EFH fare in way of these debates. Drawing upon five bodies of research, individually exploring safeguarding responses across a range of public bodies, we present an analytical framework that explores elements of safeguarding responses, constituting relationships of trust (Bryan et al 2016) or relationships of surveillance and control (Fernandez and Huey 2009). A focused literature review was conducted.…”

Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This has been subject to significant academic (Penna 2005;Edwards 2016;White and Wastell 2017) and sector debate (Shabde and Craft 1999;Mellon 2017). Yet, alongside what some (McKendrick and Finch 2017) term the 'securitization' of social welfare, and social work specifically, the importance of relationships and relational ways of working has remained intact (Bryan et al 2016;Care Crisis Review 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Watching over or Working with? Understanding Social Work Innovation in Response to Extra-Familial Harm

Wroe

Lloyd

2020

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper critically reflects on the role of surveillance and trusted relationships in social work in England and Wales. It explores the characteristics of relationships of trust and relationships of surveillance and asks how these approaches apply to emerging policy and practices responses to extra-familial forms of harm (EFH). Five bodies of research that explore safeguarding responses across a range of public bodies are drawn on to present an analytical framework that explores elements of safeguarding responses, constituting relationships of trust or relationships of surveillance and control. This analytic framework is applied to two case studies, each of which detail a recent practice innovation in response to EFH studied by the authors, as part of a larger body of work under the Contextual Safeguarding programme. The application of this framework signals a number of critical issues related to the focus/rationale, methods and impact of interventions into EFH that should be considered in future work to address EFH, to ensure young people’s rights to privacy and participation are upheld.

show abstract

“…There is a lack of agreement in the wider literature regarding the impact of technology on relationshipbased practice. Questions remain regarding the extent to which electronic communication technologies are serving to help or hinder the establishment and maintenance of relationships between social workers and those with whom they work (Bryan, Hingley-Jones, & Ruch, 2016) or how it might be possible to integrate new technologies into relationship-based practice (Turner, 2016). Space limitations constrain the review of literature presented here but the spectrum of opinion on this issue is presented by outlining the views of a selection of writers who have taken different or opposing positions on this issue.…”

Section: Relationship-buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship-based social work and electronic communication technologies: anticipation, adaptation and achievement

Byrne

Kirwan

2019

Journal of Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While social workers continue to recognise the centrality of relationship in social work practice they are now trying to build and mediate relationships with service users in a context fundamentally changed by technology. The paper suggests that different modes of electronic communication are not simply add-ons to society but are altering the social texture of society including the ways that people relate and interact with others. The relationship base of social work is not immune or dislocated from the explosion of social media and electronic communication which is occurring in the wider society and, therefore, attention needs to be paid to the impact of these new technologies on the way in which social work is practised. Using qualitative research with early career stage social workers in Ireland this paper aims to contribute to knowledge on this emerging dimension of social work practice.

show abstract

Relationship-based Practice Revisited

Cited by 16 publications

References 3 publications

Commentary on “What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography”

Commentary on “What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography”

Watching over or Working with? Understanding Social Work Innovation in Response to Extra-Familial Harm

Relationship-based social work and electronic communication technologies: anticipation, adaptation and achievement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About