2016
DOI: 10.2174/1745017901612010177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Among Body Image, Anthropometric Parameters and Mental Health in Physical Education Students

Abstract: BackgroundThe prevalence of body image dissatisfaction (BID) is currently high. Given that psychological well-being is associated with the body measurements imposed by esthetic standards, BID is an important risk factor for mental disorders.Objective Identify the prevalence of BID, and compare anthropometric and mental health parameters between individuals satisfied and dissatisfied with their body image.MethodA total of 140 university students completed the silhouette scale to screen for BID. Anthropometric m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean body weight, height and BMI were 70.7 ± 14.3 kg, 169.4 ± 1.1 cm and 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , respectively [21]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean body weight, height and BMI were 70.7 ± 14.3 kg, 169.4 ± 1.1 cm and 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , respectively [21]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI) was computed using height and weight measures (weight/height 2 ) [21, 23]. All anthropometric measurements were made in accordance with the recommendations of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global score is computed by subtracting the positive category (vigor) from the sum of the five negative categories (tension, depression, anger, fatigue, and confusion). The number 100 was added to the final TMD score to avoid negative results (Legey et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlated plasma/serum components and physical parameters (as independent variables) were further analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis to explain the causal relationships with the respective POMS scores (as dependent variables) using pairwise deletion for missing values. To determine any difference in the POMS fatigue and vigor scores with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and with at least 80% power, an appropriate sample size of 15 was calculated using the mean and standard deviation between two groups with different POMS scores reported in a previous study [ 37 ]. A post-hoc power analysis using the G*Power test computed that the achieved power for the paired-sample, two-tailed t test in 15 subjects was 99%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%