2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations of learner-centered teaching practices to adolescents’ achievement goals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
55
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We have to remember the cross-sectional nature of this study precludes us from drawing any conclusions about cause and effect relationships (Meece, Herman, & McCombs, 2003). Further research, will have to include longitudinal designs to study the role of achievement goals over time to see, for example, if mastery goals evaluated at the beginning of the academic year could in fact predict a higher academic achievement at the end of the academic year.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have to remember the cross-sectional nature of this study precludes us from drawing any conclusions about cause and effect relationships (Meece, Herman, & McCombs, 2003). Further research, will have to include longitudinal designs to study the role of achievement goals over time to see, for example, if mastery goals evaluated at the beginning of the academic year could in fact predict a higher academic achievement at the end of the academic year.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En revanche, quand les exercices à réaliser ne sont pas particulièrement difficiles, les buts de maîtrise ne sont pas reliés à la performance. Or la plupart des études ne tiennent pas particulièrement compte du niveau de difficulté des tâches (Meece, Herman & Mc Combs, 2003), alors que cette variable semble constituer un modulateur important des liens buts de maîtrise-performance.…”
Section: Conséquences Pour L'élève D'un Climat Motivationnel De Maîtrunclassified
“…Finally, most teachers are pressured to teach as much content as possible in an effort to better prepare their students for the nationwide standardized university entrance examination. These learning goals that the teachers promote (whether intentionally or unintentionally) impact the type of goals that the students adopt for themselves (Meece, Herman, & McCombs, 2003). As evidenced in the findings of this case study, the national educational policies, the nature of the science curriculum it promotes and how it is being taught influence students' attitudes towards science and their underperformance in science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%