2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations of counterface materials with stability of tribo-oxide layer and wear behavior of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [82] suggested two distinct mechanisms of deformation for CP Ti and Ti64 (at low temperatures), viz., slip and twinning, respectively. The existence of ambiguity in the mechanisms associated with plastic deformation in Ti and its alloys throw light to the fact that in-depth microstructural analysis has to be carried out.…”
Section: Mechanisms Governing Tribo-behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [82] suggested two distinct mechanisms of deformation for CP Ti and Ti64 (at low temperatures), viz., slip and twinning, respectively. The existence of ambiguity in the mechanisms associated with plastic deformation in Ti and its alloys throw light to the fact that in-depth microstructural analysis has to be carried out.…”
Section: Mechanisms Governing Tribo-behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent researches demonstrated that as the tribo-layer is a tribo-oxide layer, it is of a protective function. [11][12][13][14][15] However, as for the protective function, the comparison between tribo-oxide layer and the oxide coating has not been reported till now.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Oxide Coating And Various Tribo-oxidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of wear performance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy was proved to be attributed to the existence of tribo-oxide layers in our previous researches. [11][12][13][14][15] It can be considered that the differences of wear loss, as shown in Figure 2(c), were resulted from the respective function of the oxide coating and porous tribo-oxide layers. This result demonstrated that the oxide coating presented slightly better wear resistance than porous tribo-oxide layers.…”
Section: Comparison Of Wear Performance For the Oxide Coating And Varmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure 7c,d, sample c has greater degree of TiO bonding compared to sample b and therefore, forms a greater TiO tribo-oxide layer which is believed to be the main reason of poorer wear resistance in Ti-based alloys. It is considered that this tribo-oxide is not adherent to the substrate, is also brittle and tends to be fragmented, and therefore does not have any protective role during machining [46,47]. Although, at temperatures above 600 • C tribo-oxides can play a protective role [46], since machining in this study was performed at temparatures below 300 • C, it is most probably the formation of greater amounts of Ti-O tribo-phase in sample c causes a poor wear performance (more intensive sticking of Al on the rake face) than found in sample b.…”
Section: Xps Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%