2005
DOI: 10.1556/crc.33.2005.1.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between yield and photosynthetic activity of winter wheat varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to data reported, chlorophyll photosynthetic potential (ChPhP), which characterizes the total amount of chlorophyll in the above-ground parts of plants (or in leaves) per unit of ground surface area during the growing season or a certain period, is most closely related to crop yield (1)(2)(3). In different winter wheat genotypes we have found a close correlation between ChPhP in leaves and crop productivity allowing forecasting the yield magnitude (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to data reported, chlorophyll photosynthetic potential (ChPhP), which characterizes the total amount of chlorophyll in the above-ground parts of plants (or in leaves) per unit of ground surface area during the growing season or a certain period, is most closely related to crop yield (1)(2)(3). In different winter wheat genotypes we have found a close correlation between ChPhP in leaves and crop productivity allowing forecasting the yield magnitude (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought affects photosynthesis parameters of the plants, especially stomatal conductance and in consequence intercellular CO 2 level of the leaves [33][34][35][36]. In April and May, the plants were in drought stress according to the intercellular CO 2 levels and the total conductance to carbon dioxide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of GK É let from an agronomic aspect is well known (Kutasy et al 2005), as its yield parameters decrease under drought stress. Our results indicated that the root length did not characterize the sensitivity of these varieties, as the sensitive GK É let had longer and the tolerant Mv Emese had shorter root system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GK É let, were investigated under control and osmotic stress conditions. The drought sensitivities of the varieties were determined by breeders on the basis of the yield (tonnes per hectare) and yield stability in drought years (Kutasy et al 2005;Hoffmann and Burucs 2005). Plants were grown in a hydroponic culture in Hoagland nutrient solution (5 mM Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , 5 mM KNO 3 , 1 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 2 mM MgSO 4 , 1 lM Fe-EDTA, 0.0475 lM H 3 BO 3 , 14.48 lM MnCl 2 , 0.8148 lM ZnCl 2 , 0.3731 lM CuCl 2 , 0.001213 lM Na 2 MoO 4 ), at a light intensity of 300 lmol m -2 s -1 , under a 12-h day/12-h night cycle, at 25/20°C day/night temperature and at 55-60% air humidity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%