2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12995-020-00272-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between vital capacity, CO diffusion capacity and computed tomographic findings of former asbestos-exposed patients: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background: Asbestos-related lung diseases are one of the leading diagnoses of the recognized occupational diseases in Germany, both in terms of their number and their socioeconomic costs. The aim of this study was to determine whether pulmonary function testing (spirometry and CO diffusion measurement (D LCO)) and computed tomography of the thorax (TCT) are relevant for the early detection of asbestos-related pleural and pulmonary fibrosis and the assessment of the functional deficiency. Methods: The records … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant scores for the presence of asbestos-typical findings, as also confirmed in previous studies, are the scores for irregular/linear opacities (fibrosis score, Score A) and pleural plaques (pleural plaques score, Score B) [ 10 ]. In addition to the categories described, it is possible for the evaluator to mark additional pathological findings on the ICOERD sheet.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The relevant scores for the presence of asbestos-typical findings, as also confirmed in previous studies, are the scores for irregular/linear opacities (fibrosis score, Score A) and pleural plaques (pleural plaques score, Score B) [ 10 ]. In addition to the categories described, it is possible for the evaluator to mark additional pathological findings on the ICOERD sheet.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The number of pack-years ranges from 0 to 71 (median 34 years). The dose of asbestos exposure was not recorded because previous studies have not found a relationship between exposure duration and lung function values or only rough dose–response relationships [ 10 , 32 ]. The evaluation of occupational histories reveals that patients were exposed to asbestos in 22 different occupations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations