2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between speech‐reception, psychophysical temporal processing, and subcortical electrophysiological measures of auditory function in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the test was also applied to a population with abnormal auditory temporal processing tests (abnormal adults—AA) and older adults (OA) with no cognitive impairment, with a view to verifying the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed normative values. The AA group was chosen to test the cutoff points due to the shared behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical correlates of the ATP tests [ 1 , 2 , 33 ], while the OA group was expected to perform worse at the BMT test due to a decline in general perceptual processing [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the test was also applied to a population with abnormal auditory temporal processing tests (abnormal adults—AA) and older adults (OA) with no cognitive impairment, with a view to verifying the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed normative values. The AA group was chosen to test the cutoff points due to the shared behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical correlates of the ATP tests [ 1 , 2 , 33 ], while the OA group was expected to perform worse at the BMT test due to a decline in general perceptual processing [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%