1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07498.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between family environment and adjustment outcomes in young adults with spina bifida

Abstract: Thirty‐two young adults with spina bifida completed a questionnaire (Family Environment Scale) assessing their perceptions of family social environment while growing up. Additionally, subjects responded to a structured interview addressing their current employment status, residential situation, level of community mobility, and extent of social activity. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relation between family environment and adjustment as a young adult. With this limited sample, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the FES have been used as a predictor of life transitions in various clinical populations, including behavioral (e.g., ADHD), emotional (e.g., depression), and developmental disabilities, physically ill children (e.g., cancer, TBI), and congenital handicaps (e.g., cystic fibrosis, spina bifida, cerebral palsy) (Biederman et al, 1995; Loomis, Javornisky, Monahan, Burke, & Lindsay, 1997; Rice, Harold, Shelton, & Thapar, 2006; Rivara et al, 1996; Rousey, Wild, & Blacher, 2002; Varni, Katz, Colegrove, & Dolgin, 1996). Because of its widespread use, predictive validity and reliability, the FES was used in the current investigation to identify family environment variables that might explain some of the large variability in cochlear implant outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the FES have been used as a predictor of life transitions in various clinical populations, including behavioral (e.g., ADHD), emotional (e.g., depression), and developmental disabilities, physically ill children (e.g., cancer, TBI), and congenital handicaps (e.g., cystic fibrosis, spina bifida, cerebral palsy) (Biederman et al, 1995; Loomis, Javornisky, Monahan, Burke, & Lindsay, 1997; Rice, Harold, Shelton, & Thapar, 2006; Rivara et al, 1996; Rousey, Wild, & Blacher, 2002; Varni, Katz, Colegrove, & Dolgin, 1996). Because of its widespread use, predictive validity and reliability, the FES was used in the current investigation to identify family environment variables that might explain some of the large variability in cochlear implant outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, in which patients with the lowest intelligence had been excluded, higher intelligence, better educational level, and higher independence in toiletting predicted participation in work (18). There is also evidence that family environment and behavioural functioning affect participation in work in persons with meningomyelocele (17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similarly, in children with SB, parent's stress, psychosocial adjustment, and marital satisfaction were found to predict children's psychological outcomes (Friedrich et al, 1991). Adolescents with SB from families that encouraged independence, treated the adolescent in an age-appropriate manner, and did not overprotect the adolescent, were more likely to have positive adaptation outcomes (Aldrich et al, 1992;Loomis et al, 1997;McAndrew, 1979;Pless, 1984). Family satisfaction, an individual's belief that their family is functioning in a satisfactory and supportive manner, captures an important component in family resourcefulness (Austin & Huberty, 1989;Smilkstein et al, 1982), and is included as a possible protective factor in the current study.…”
Section: Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%