2012
DOI: 10.1080/12538078.2012.696939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between climax vegetation and isobioclimates in the Northwest of Spain (León province)

Abstract: This paper determines the isobioclimates existing in the province of León (north-western Spain) as the result of combining macrobioclimates, bioclimates, bioclimatic variants, thermotypes, ombrotypes and their corresponding bioclimatic horizons, all obtained from the analysis of eighty-three transects distributed throughout the study area The relations between isobioclimates and climax vegetation are also analysed. Twenty-six different isobioclimates are identified (15 temperate and 11 Mediterranean). Most veg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such information is essential to understand vegetation distribution and structure (e.g. Box, 1996;Ríos-Cornejo, del Río, & Penas, 2012), to perform habitat modeling (Guisan & Zimmerman, 2000) and to analyze vegetation dynamics, subsequently allowing the reconstruction of vegetation series and potential natural vegetation (Blasi, Filibeck, Frondoni, Rosati, & Smiraglia, 2004;Blasi et al, 2012;Farris, Filibeck, Marignani, & Rosati, 2010). Furthermore, bioclimatic models, focusing on climatic thresholds of species distributions, can predict the responses of living organisms to climate change (Huntley, Berry, Cramer, & McDonald, 1995;Pearson & Dawson, 2003;Walther, Berger, & Sykes, 2005) because integrated and biologically relevant combinations are better suited to exploring potential ecosystem response to changing climates than raw climate data (Torregrosa, Taylor, Flint & Flint, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such information is essential to understand vegetation distribution and structure (e.g. Box, 1996;Ríos-Cornejo, del Río, & Penas, 2012), to perform habitat modeling (Guisan & Zimmerman, 2000) and to analyze vegetation dynamics, subsequently allowing the reconstruction of vegetation series and potential natural vegetation (Blasi, Filibeck, Frondoni, Rosati, & Smiraglia, 2004;Blasi et al, 2012;Farris, Filibeck, Marignani, & Rosati, 2010). Furthermore, bioclimatic models, focusing on climatic thresholds of species distributions, can predict the responses of living organisms to climate change (Huntley, Berry, Cramer, & McDonald, 1995;Pearson & Dawson, 2003;Walther, Berger, & Sykes, 2005) because integrated and biologically relevant combinations are better suited to exploring potential ecosystem response to changing climates than raw climate data (Torregrosa, Taylor, Flint & Flint, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugi omenjeni vidik škodljivosti, to je porušenje ekosistemskih ravnotežij, je zelo relativen, če jemljemo stanje rastlinskih in živalskih družb kot evolucijsko dinamično -nenehno spreminjajoče se ravnotežje omejenega števila vrst, ki v neki združbi uspejo obstati. To velja za manjše enote rastlinskih združb in tudi za večje geografske enote, kot je na primer tako imenovana klimaksna vegetacija (Box, 1996;Niering, 2005;Rios-Cornejo et al, 2012). Na našem planetu ni nič trajnega in, če se združbe spremenijo zaradi učinka rastlin je to naravno, pa naj si človek še tako domišlja, da je on merilo in regulator naravnih procesov.…”
Section: Razumevanje Dinamike Globalnega Preseljevanja Rastlinunclassified