2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between allometry, male–male interactions and dispersal in a sap beetle, Librodor japonicus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…data). Further investigation of the influence of size and age on dispersal patterns in the PIT tag data is warranted and ongoing, as size-dependent dispersal has been demonstrated in a variety of taxa, from fishes (Dorazio et al 1994, Imbert et al 2010) to arthropods (Etherington & Eggleston 2003, Okada et al 2007). In the meantime, the likely oc currence of ontogenetic redistribution indicated by conventional and PIT tag data does not preclude the establishment of spawning stock structure, indicated by PAT tag results, at scales relevant to fishery management.…”
Section: Spawning Group Spatial Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…data). Further investigation of the influence of size and age on dispersal patterns in the PIT tag data is warranted and ongoing, as size-dependent dispersal has been demonstrated in a variety of taxa, from fishes (Dorazio et al 1994, Imbert et al 2010) to arthropods (Etherington & Eggleston 2003, Okada et al 2007). In the meantime, the likely oc currence of ontogenetic redistribution indicated by conventional and PIT tag data does not preclude the establishment of spawning stock structure, indicated by PAT tag results, at scales relevant to fishery management.…”
Section: Spawning Group Spatial Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of male beetles have reported morphological trade-offs between weapons and sensory organs such as eyes and antennae (Nijhout & Emlen 1998;Emlen 2001), as well as between weapons and other traits related to mating success, including wings used in mate searching (Kawano 1995;Tomkins et al 2005;Okada et al 2007) and testes as a measure of male spermatogenic investment (Simmons & Emlen 2006). Such trade-offs indirectly suggest that dispersal and ejaculatory strategies can coevolve with the weapons used in armed male beetles (Emlen 2001;Simmons & Emlen 2006;Okada et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such trade-offs indirectly suggest that dispersal and ejaculatory strategies can coevolve with the weapons used in armed male beetles (Emlen 2001;Simmons & Emlen 2006;Okada et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trade-off relationship between the weapon and flight apparatus is often observed as a characteristic of weaponed insects, reflecting the diverse reproductive strategy of males (48)(49)(50). A distinct type of HDAC (e.g., HDAC1, HDAC3) that causes antagonistic responses to the mandible and wing may be associated with the trade-off relationship, but further investigations of the epigenetic status of the genes involved in mandible and wing development are required to confirm this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%