2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0034445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations among affect, abstinence motivation and confidence, and daily smoking lapse risk.

Abstract: Aims-This study tested the hypothesis that changes in momentary affect, abstinence motivation, and confidence would predict lapse risk over the next 12-24 hours using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data from smokers attempting to quit smoking.Method-103 adult, daily, treatment-seeking smokers recorded their momentary affect, motivation to quit, abstinence confidence, and smoking behaviors in near real time with multiple EMA reports per day using electronic diaries post-quit.Results-Multilevel models ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Momentary affect (for the past 15 minutes) was assessed with items derived from the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS ) and the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS ) using a five‐point response ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely) for the PANAS items and 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree) for the WSWS items. Negative affect items included ‘tense or anxious’, ‘sad or depressed’, ‘impatient’, ‘distressed’, and ‘upset’, which load on a single factor . Positive affect items included ‘enthusiastic’ and ‘interested’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Momentary affect (for the past 15 minutes) was assessed with items derived from the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS ) and the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS ) using a five‐point response ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely) for the PANAS items and 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree) for the WSWS items. Negative affect items included ‘tense or anxious’, ‘sad or depressed’, ‘impatient’, ‘distressed’, and ‘upset’, which load on a single factor . Positive affect items included ‘enthusiastic’ and ‘interested’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available research further supports the role of these risk factors as predictors of smoking behavior. Specifically, smoking to alleviate negative affect (i.e., withdrawal) may maintain smoking over time (Baker et al, 2004), and momentary negative affect predicts temptations and lapses (Minami et al, 2014; Shiffman et al, 1996). At present, it is unknown how positive affect relates to the occurrence of temptations and success resisting them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of strong relations between negative affect and smoking outcomes is not surprising (Baker et al, 2004; Ferguson & Shiffman, 2014; Piasecki et al, 2003b). There has been mixed evidence that positive affect is meaningfully related to smoking outcomes (Bold et al, 2016; Minami et al, 2014; Piper et al, 2008; Piper et al, 2009; Sayette & Dimoff, 2016), especially with regard to the intra-individual variability of positive affect. Our use of an adjustment for ERS and its resulting effects may shed new light on these findings, as well as the symptomatic patterns associated with relapse likelihood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%