The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2018
DOI: 10.24043/isj.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationality and island studies in the Anthropocene

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The island has become arguably one of the most emblematic figures of the Anthropocene. It is regularly invoked as exemplary of the changing stakes of our planet. This generates a crucially important role for island studies scholars; to explore, question, but now perhaps also trouble, some fundamental debates about islands in the Anthropocene. This paper picks up a particularly recurrent theme for island scholarship in recent decades-relationality and islands-and reorientates this within the stakes of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In what follows we argue that how we conceptualise island studies, like so many other fields of study today, is profoundly brought into question by the Anthropocene. Whereas up until recently through the relational turn in island studies there was an emphasis on disrupting the static, insular and peripheral island form, today the new stakes of the Anthropocene further disrupt the human/nature boundary in profoundly disorientating ways, demanding new approaches to thinking through relationality and islands (see also Pugh, ).…”
Section: The Shifting Terms Of Debate In Island Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows we argue that how we conceptualise island studies, like so many other fields of study today, is profoundly brought into question by the Anthropocene. Whereas up until recently through the relational turn in island studies there was an emphasis on disrupting the static, insular and peripheral island form, today the new stakes of the Anthropocene further disrupt the human/nature boundary in profoundly disorientating ways, demanding new approaches to thinking through relationality and islands (see also Pugh, ).…”
Section: The Shifting Terms Of Debate In Island Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grydehøj and Kelman (2017) highlight the "eco-island trap" arising from "conspicuous sustainability," Cheer et al (2017) question how islanders may respond to the eco-cultural tourist imagination, and Pugh (2018) and Chandler and Pugh (2018) argue that emblematic and idealised island visions risk concealing the intense relationalities of the Anthropocene. These differ from critical studies of the global trend for exploiting small island eco-cultural resources, in which our research is broadly situated.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differ from critical studies of the global trend for exploiting small island eco-cultural resources, in which our research is broadly situated. Grydehøj and Kelman (2017) highlight the "eco-island trap" arising from "conspicuous sustainability," Cheer et al (2017) question how islanders may respond to the eco-cultural tourist imagination, and Pugh (2018) and Chandler and Pugh (2018) argue that emblematic and idealised island visions risk concealing the intense relationalities of the Anthropocene.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Hong et al (2013) note the contribution of traditional lifestyles to conservation of biodiversity by paying attention to the relationship between the biodiversity of Asian islands, traditional biocultural diversity, and traditional ecological knowledge. Some scholars have, however, been critical of the manner in which the discourse of sustainability and ecology sometimes overshadows or crowds out attention to other issues in island communities (Baldacchino, 2018;Grydehøj & Kelman, 2017;Baldacchino & Kelman, 2014), while Pugh (2018) calls for recognition of the more nuanced relationality affecting environmental processes in the Anthropocene. These various discussions are useful for examining the traditional ways of life and ecological knowledge of the peoples of Okinawa and Jeju.…”
Section: Theories Of Ecology and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%