2004
DOI: 10.1177/0907568204044888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational Discourses

Abstract: Abstract:This article presents quantitative and qualitative accounts of relational discourses in a random sample of approx 4,100 texts written by Irish young people (aged 10-12 and 14-17 years). The existence of such discourses is indicated by references to family and friends. It shows that although the majority refer to such ties in their texts, less than one third mention best friends. It also shows that references to such relational discourses was affected by age and gender. A continuum of relatedness can b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the verbal part of the interviews turned out to be of substantial importance. Moreover, the frequent inclusion of a pet in children's accounts of their family members points out the importance of pets as ‘significant others’ in children's depiction of kin (Morrow, ,b; O'Connor and others, ; Tipper, ). Furthermore, our data show that the contours of one's family often are not easy to identify, and the synopsis of children's and parents' interviews illustrates that family construction can be different for every single family ‘member’ (Carroll and others, ; Rigg and Pryor, ; Zartler, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the verbal part of the interviews turned out to be of substantial importance. Moreover, the frequent inclusion of a pet in children's accounts of their family members points out the importance of pets as ‘significant others’ in children's depiction of kin (Morrow, ,b; O'Connor and others, ; Tipper, ). Furthermore, our data show that the contours of one's family often are not easy to identify, and the synopsis of children's and parents' interviews illustrates that family construction can be different for every single family ‘member’ (Carroll and others, ; Rigg and Pryor, ; Zartler, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%