DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85654-2_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational Database Migration: A Perspective

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents an investigation into approaches and techniques used for database conversion. Constructing object views on top of a Relational DataBase (RDB), simple database integration and database migration are among these approaches. We present a categorisation of selected works proposed in the literature and translation techniques used for the problem of database conversion, concentrating on migrating an RDB as source into object-based and XML databases as targets. Database migration from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transformation of a relational database into a graph database includes schema translation and data conversion [24]. The schema translation can turn the source schema into the target schema by applying a set of mapping rules.…”
Section: Graph Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation of a relational database into a graph database includes schema translation and data conversion [24]. The schema translation can turn the source schema into the target schema by applying a set of mapping rules.…”
Section: Graph Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relational database transformation into a graph database includes schema translation and data conversion (Maatuk et al 2008). The schema translation can turn the source schema into the target schema by applying a set of mapping rules.…”
Section: Converting Relational Database Into Hypernode Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.4showsthe To demonstratethe effectiveness and validity ofthe CDM, a prototype has been developedusing Java 1.5,realizingthe algorithmpresented in this paper.Wesetuptwo experiments to evaluate our approach by examining the differencesbetweensource RDB and target databasesgenerated bythe prototype.Theexperimentswererun on a PC with Pentium IV 3.2 GHz CPU and 1024 MB RAM operatingunder Windows XP Professional.We measureddatabase equivalences, includingsemantics preservation,loss of dataandredundancy, and integrity constraints. Full detailsaboutthe experimentscan befound in [14,15]. In the firstexperiment, wetest schema information preservation by comparing the target schemas resultingfromour prototype and those generated from other manual-based mapping techniques.A schema is correct if all concepts of underlying model are used correctly with respect to syntax andsemantics [10].…”
Section: B Algorithm For Generation Of Cdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the work has been focused onschema translation ratherthandata conversionwith an aim to generate one target data model based on its conceptual schema or other representations as an intermediate stage for enrichment. In addition, the existing work does not provide a complete solution for more than one target database,for either schema or data conversion.A classification on database migration techniques can be found in our work [13].…”
Section: B Algorithm For Generation Of Cdmmentioning
confidence: 99%