Relational and Logistical Dimensions of Agricultural Food Recovery: Evidence from California Growers and Recovery Organizations

Abstract

Efforts to recover on-farm food losses by emergency food organizations or businesses serving secondary markets have been promoted as a “win–win” solution to both food waste and hunger. We examined what it will take to realize this potential, drawing on interviews with 35 fresh produce growers and 15 representatives from food recovery organizations in California. By taking grower constraints seriously and identifying key dynamics in their relationships with food recovery partners, we provide a textured account of the relevant logistical and relational challenges and promising solutions. Our research makes three specific contributions: (1) providing a straightforward conceptual rubric to clarify when food recovery partnerships are likely to be more or less difficult to achieve; (2) highlighting key relational strategies or approaches that make success more likely, even if logistical barriers appear daunting; and (3) emphasizing the dynamic, developmental, and context-specific nature of recovery partnerships, such that “what works” will necessarily change over time and across different settings. Based on our analysis, successful partnerships require investments of time and attention that are in short supply, but necessary to establish and sustain recovery relationships. The path forward appears less rosy than presumed by those who focus on statistics suggesting a large recovery potential, but also more promising than presumed by those who see the structural challenges (both economic/logistical and social/relational) as inherently insurmountable.

Efficient value chain as a factor for reducing losses and ensuring food security

“…Retail trade has a significant impact on waste generation and contributes significantly to losses generation. Retail trade does not fully use the provisions of international standards regarding quality gradations of fresh fruits and vegetables, which, along with donating surplus food to emergency food organizations, collecting unprocessed products on farms, and marketing or processing of "ugly" products [14], could constitute a new direction of "charitable logistics". Reverse logistics for the "fresh fruits and vegetables" product group needs to be improved.…”

Farm to Food Bank: Exploring the Ties between Local Food Producers and Charitable Food Assistance☆

“…California food banks are leaders in distributing fresh produce; however, affluent suburbs house the majority of food banks that source larger proportions of their food from local produce (Vitiello et al 2013(Vitiello et al , 2015. In explanation, Meagher et al (2020) found that both logistical/economic barriers and weak relationships often prevented farm relationships with food banks. In their study of California CSA and farmers market managers, Guthman, Morris, and Allen (2006) found that most TFNs Farm to Food Bank works-Haynes Stein and Brinkley 687 were concerned with access to food for low-income consumers, and in practice heavily relied on private food assistance programs and SNAP as their response to increasing access.…”