New Research Directions in DNA Repair 2013
DOI: 10.5772/54020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of the Types of DNA Damage to Replication Stress and the Induction of Premature Chromosome Condensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously we described that prolonged HU treatment led to rapid phosphorylation of histone H2A variant H2AX on S139 resulting in the formation of phospho-H2AXS139 foci along megabase chromatin domains near the sites of DSBs [ 37 ]. We also showed that the breakage of restrictive interactions of intra-S-phase checkpoints during PCC induction resulted in the accumulation of SSBs (co-locatization experiments using anti-ssDNA and anti-H2AXS139ph antibodies; [ 38 ]). Here, through quantitative immunocytochemical, tissue printing-related and biochemical analyses, we finally proved that both replication stress and PCC induction resulted in DNA damage ( Fig 1A and 1B ) and HU induced DSBs while HU/CF SSBs ( Fig 1 and Fig 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously we described that prolonged HU treatment led to rapid phosphorylation of histone H2A variant H2AX on S139 resulting in the formation of phospho-H2AXS139 foci along megabase chromatin domains near the sites of DSBs [ 37 ]. We also showed that the breakage of restrictive interactions of intra-S-phase checkpoints during PCC induction resulted in the accumulation of SSBs (co-locatization experiments using anti-ssDNA and anti-H2AXS139ph antibodies; [ 38 ]). Here, through quantitative immunocytochemical, tissue printing-related and biochemical analyses, we finally proved that both replication stress and PCC induction resulted in DNA damage ( Fig 1A and 1B ) and HU induced DSBs while HU/CF SSBs ( Fig 1 and Fig 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous results showed that labeling cell nuclei using antibodies recognizing PARP2 gene product, i.e. poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2 (PARP-2), was an equally sensitive test detecting SSBs within DNA molecules [ 38 ]. Immunocytochemical analysis showed a low constitutive level of PARP-2 protein in the control cells (1.5% ± 0.3), an over 14-fold increase in PARP-2 protein after treatment with HU (21.3% ± 1.9) and specific labeling of almost half of the cells forming the root meristem (46.2% ± 2.8) in the series in which PCC was induced with CF ( Fig 1Ag , Fig 1Ag' , Fig 1Ah and Fig 1Ai ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cells of S. pombe, Rad17 (RFC1 factor and four small subunits RFC2-5) and Rad9/Hus1/Rad1 (PCNAlike 9-1-1 complex), participate not only in the functional organization of the intra-S phase checkpoint, but also other cell cycle checkpoints whose function is to monitor the structural DNA damage [e.g. G2(Majka et al, 2006, reviewed byLin & Dutta, 2007)]. Recruitment of PCNA-like complexes to the sites of DNA damage in a molecule is, perhaps, independent of the activation of ATR and Chk1(Niimi et al, 2008;Scorah et al, 2008), but is an important element of the mechanism signaling the appearance of structural disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%