2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2907397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of RBH Auditory-Perceptual Scale to Acoustic and Electroglottographic Voice Analysis in Children With Vocal Nodules

Abstract: The aim of this paper was to present an analysis of the feasibility of voice quality prediction on the roughness, breathiness, hoarseness (RBH) scale for children with vocal nodules on the basis of both acoustic parameters and electroglottographic (EGG) examination. The first step to achieve this goal involved the creation of a dedicated database, Voice Pathology Analysis Database (VPADB), containing voice recordings from patients, the EGG signal, medical diagnosis, and the classification of voice quality on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analysis revealed an overall low and neglectable influence of subject age. VRQOL, I max , F max and Jit(%) were found to be the most reliable parameter subset for differentiating between groups N 01 , FD 01 and FD 23 . Furthermore those parameters also reflected changes between pre-and post-treatment groups.…”
Section: A Summarymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical analysis revealed an overall low and neglectable influence of subject age. VRQOL, I max , F max and Jit(%) were found to be the most reliable parameter subset for differentiating between groups N 01 , FD 01 and FD 23 . Furthermore those parameters also reflected changes between pre-and post-treatment groups.…”
Section: A Summarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…S2). Whilst the addition of neither F min , nor I max to the parameter set yielded a distinct increase in AUC or ACC, both contributed by decreasing the difference between sensitivity and specificity, mainly for the male group comparison FD 01 vs. FD 23 . Males have a lower speaking fundamental frequency than females [60] and whilst F max was more important to identify voice disorder in females (see Fig.…”
Section: Model Selection and Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EGG signal was acquired from the developed prototype, statistical features were extracted from the acquired signal and further the normal and thyroid individuals were classified based on the machine learning classifiers. 16 Szklanny et al, proposed a noninvasive diagnostic tool for assessing the vocal nodules based on a genetic algorithm. Input data used for the study is voice and EGG recording of the individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%