2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.85.022106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between wave-particle duality and quantum uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In history, coherence (the ability to interfere) is usually treated to represent the wave property, and location (or localized position) is used to characterize the particle property. Such correspondences were first established quantitatively by Wootters and Zurek [3] and then followed by many others [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] to achieve a duality inequality, V 2 + D 2 1, between single quantum object wave interference visibility V and particle location distinguishability D. Extended studies have explored more specific physical properties, in addition to coherence and localized position, by establishing quantitative connections of the duality inequality with photon polarization [11][12][13][14][15][16], single-particle quantum states [17], and alternative coherence measures [18,19]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the wave-particle property is connected to the self-entanglement between path and all remaining intrinsic properties (degrees of freedom) of the same single quantum object, leading to a threeway complementary identity [20,21], V 2 + D 2 + C 2 = 1, with C being the usual entanglement measure concurrence [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In history, coherence (the ability to interfere) is usually treated to represent the wave property, and location (or localized position) is used to characterize the particle property. Such correspondences were first established quantitatively by Wootters and Zurek [3] and then followed by many others [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] to achieve a duality inequality, V 2 + D 2 1, between single quantum object wave interference visibility V and particle location distinguishability D. Extended studies have explored more specific physical properties, in addition to coherence and localized position, by establishing quantitative connections of the duality inequality with photon polarization [11][12][13][14][15][16], single-particle quantum states [17], and alternative coherence measures [18,19]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the wave-particle property is connected to the self-entanglement between path and all remaining intrinsic properties (degrees of freedom) of the same single quantum object, leading to a threeway complementary identity [20,21], V 2 + D 2 + C 2 = 1, with C being the usual entanglement measure concurrence [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An indication of the importance of the WZ analysis is indicated by the interest it has attracted from numerous authors, who, based on the WZ analysis developed a particle-wave duality relation. The first such relation was introduced by Greenberger and Yasin (GY) [14], with further developments in references [48,49,51,52,53,54]. Among the latter are detailed derivations, the most notable of which are by Jaeger, Shimony and Vaidman (JSV) [48], and then by Englert [49].…”
Section: The Particle-wave Duality Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a quantitative narrative was later furnished through many investigations including the one by Greenberger et al [6][7][8][9]. Moreover, a comparison as well as quantitative link between complementarity and quantum uncertainty have also been debated recently [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%