2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.83.015502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between the0νββand2νββnuclear matrix elements reexamined

Abstract: We show that the dominant Gamow-Teller part, M 0ν GT , of the nuclear matrix element governing the neutrinoless ββ decay is related to the matrix element M 2ν cl governing the allowed two-neutrino ββ decay. That relation is revealed when these matrix elements are expressed as functions of the relative distance r between the pair of neutrons that are transformed into a pair of protons in the ββ decay. Analyzing this relation allows us to understand the contrasting behavior of these matrix elements when A and Z … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
78
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
5
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,13,24,25,[49][50][51]. Because it is not our prior task in this paper to estimate these uncertainties, we just clarify here a few things about our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[11,13,24,25,[49][50][51]. Because it is not our prior task in this paper to estimate these uncertainties, we just clarify here a few things about our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it has been known for some time (see e.g. [10], [11] and references therein) that these energies are small compared to the neutrino exchange energy, and therefore the widely used closure approximation replaces these energies by a constant value and sums-out the contribution of the intermediate states. We will start with the case for the 0νββ decay of 76 Ge that is shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10], [11] and references therein) that these energies are small compared to the neutrino exchange energy, and therefore the widely used closure approximation replaces these energies by a constant value and sums-out the contribution of the intermediate states. It was shown [10], [12], [11] that this approximation provides matrix elements about 10% smaller, but we recently found [10], [12] optimal closure energies for which the nuclear matrix elements in both approaches are the same (see e.g. Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition of M ′ 0ν allows to display the effects of the uncertainties in g ef f A and to use the same phase factor G 0ν when calculating the 0νββ-decay rate. The treatment of quenching g ef f A is an important source of difference between the calculated 0νββ-decay NMEs [35,38]. Quenching of the axial-vector coupling was introduced to account for the fact that the calculated strengths of the GamowTeller β-decay transitions to individual final states are significantly larger than the experimental ones.…”
Section: Effective Majorana Mass and The 0νββ-decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary experimental information from related processes like the 2νββ-decay [46], charge-exchange [49] and particle transfer reactions [50] is also very important. The differences between the results of various nuclear structure approaches could be understood by performing an anatomy of the 0νββ-decay NME [35,38,51] . The recent development in the field is very encouraging.…”
Section: Effective Majorana Mass and The 0νββ-decaymentioning
confidence: 99%