2010
DOI: 10.1260/1475-472x.9.4-5.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between the Generalized Acoustic Analogy and Lilley's Contributions to Aeroacoustics

Abstract: This paper reviews Lilley's reformulation of Lighthill's equation and shows that it can be obtained as a special case of a much more general acoustic analogy. It also shows how this generalized analogy can be used to eliminate some of the difficulties that arise when more conventional parallel flow analogies are applied to high speed jets. And, finally, some recent applications of these ideas are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The governing acoustic perturbations may be obtained by writing the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations as a set of mean flow equations (referred to as a non-radiating base flow), plus a set of linear equations for the fluctuating components of the motion. By selecting a set of five appropriately defined perturbation variables, four of them nonlinear, Goldstein [14] shows that the left-hand side of the acoustic equations resemble those obtained by linearizing the convective form of Euler equations about a similar base flow. Further, by assuming the mean flow as locally parallel, the factors on the left-hand side of momentum and energy equations that explicitly depend on the viscous stresses reduce to higher order terms and are neglected.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Scrubbing Noise Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The governing acoustic perturbations may be obtained by writing the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations as a set of mean flow equations (referred to as a non-radiating base flow), plus a set of linear equations for the fluctuating components of the motion. By selecting a set of five appropriately defined perturbation variables, four of them nonlinear, Goldstein [14] shows that the left-hand side of the acoustic equations resemble those obtained by linearizing the convective form of Euler equations about a similar base flow. Further, by assuming the mean flow as locally parallel, the factors on the left-hand side of momentum and energy equations that explicitly depend on the viscous stresses reduce to higher order terms and are neglected.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Scrubbing Noise Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure variable ′ π consists of additional (higher order) terms that reduce to zero in the far field acoustic domain, and the source term on the right hand side of (1) is defined according to the generalized acoustic analogy [14].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Scrubbing Noise Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, for sound predictions based on the LES that had to resolve a mixture of sound generation and propagation effects that appear in the definition of the Lighthill stress, large errors in overall sound pressure levels were reported. This revealed the importance of explicitly representing linear meanflow propagation effects in the acoustic analogy equations, which are partly accounted for in the Lilley acoustic analogy and, most consistently, in the Goldstein generalised acoustic analogy (for a detailed discussion of the differences between the two analogies see (Goldstein 2010)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%