2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-010-0085-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between termite numbers and the size of their mounds

Abstract: This article provides a meta-analysis of quantitative data available in literature regarding the relation between termite numbers and the volume of their mounds for 24 species belonging to 13 genera. The leading question behind this analysis is: ''how do the respiratory gas exchanges regulate the size of termite mounds?'' This question is answered through the analysis of the log-log regression between the volume of the mound and the number of inhabitants. The most confident data support the hypothesis of a res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative allometry between colony size and nest volume found for the three studied species agrees with the general pattern reported for termites (Josens & Soki, ), although correlational data alone are not sufficient to infer the precise allometric mechanism; it may involve nest respiratory constraints, as suggested by the latter authors, but also several other mechanisms, such as decreased queen fertility (Lepage & Darlington, ). While this issue requires further study, the increase in the strength of the correlation between total biomass and number of nests as the species scaling exponent decreased is consistent with the idea that colony‐nest allometry is linked to intra‐specific variability in colony size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative allometry between colony size and nest volume found for the three studied species agrees with the general pattern reported for termites (Josens & Soki, ), although correlational data alone are not sufficient to infer the precise allometric mechanism; it may involve nest respiratory constraints, as suggested by the latter authors, but also several other mechanisms, such as decreased queen fertility (Lepage & Darlington, ). While this issue requires further study, the increase in the strength of the correlation between total biomass and number of nests as the species scaling exponent decreased is consistent with the idea that colony‐nest allometry is linked to intra‐specific variability in colony size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, Lepage () quantified nests and biomass of Macrotermes bellicosus Smeathman in five plots in the Comoé National Park, Ivory Coast. This species has one of the lowest termite scaling exponents between colony size (in number of individuals) and nest volume, 0.4 (Josens & Soki, ). Thus, we expected variation in its biomass to largely reflect nest numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a height greater than 2.0 m, mounds seem to be able to enlarge their chimney rapidly (within some days), but the chimney also becomes more vulnerable, with a higher risk of breaking. The above-mentioned positive correlation between the size of a colony or its egg production with mound height (Darlington and Dransfield, 1987;Kaib et al, 2001) holds not only for M. michaelseni, but also for further Macrotermes species (Darlington, 1990;Darlington et al, 1992;Meyer et al, 2000) and also for several different termite groups (see reviews by Lepage and Darlington, 2000;Josens and Soki, 2010).…”
Section: General Distribution Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we estimated the total termite number in our 1-ha plot for each year using the following formula, established by Josens and Soki (2010) for A. banksi on the basis of Martius and Ribeiro's (1996) data: for any given nest, log 10 N = 4.73 + 0.67 log 10 V , with N being the number of individuals and V the nest volume. To test whether the average nest volume differed between years, we carried out a Kruskal-Wallis test using estimated nest volume as data input.…”
Section: Demographymentioning
confidence: 99%