2008
DOI: 10.1121/1.2924146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between perceived voice register and flow glottogram parameters in males

Abstract: The perception of modal and falsetto registers was analyzed in a material consisting of a total of 104 vowel sounds sung by 13 choir singers, 52 sung in modal register, and 52 in falsetto register. These vowel sounds were classified by 16 expert listeners in a forced choice test and the number of votes for modal was compared to the voice source parameters: (1) closed quotient (Q(closed)), (2) level difference between the two lowest source spectrum partials (H1-H2), (3) AC amplitude, (4) maximum flow declinatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
11
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The same observations have been made in several other investigations, using EGG or inverse filtering. 4,5,14 In general, our measurements of glottal area agreed with these observations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The same observations have been made in several other investigations, using EGG or inverse filtering. 4,5,14 In general, our measurements of glottal area agreed with these observations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has been generally accepted that the duration of the closed phase is greater in chest register than in falsetto (Choi et al, 1993;Henrich et al, 2005;Hirano, 1981;Roubeau, 2009;Salomão and Sundberg, 2008;Vilkman et al, 1995). Our data, based on CQ VKG calculations, indicate that this assumption is valid, but only for the cases when the posterior adduction in falsetto is the same or reduced compared to the chest register.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 37%
“…The literature on vocal registers abounds with descriptions of peripheral mechanisms and perceptual identification of registers (Roubeau et al 1987, Abramson et al 2004, Henrich 2006, Echternach et al 2008, Salomao and Sundberg 2008, Echternach et al 2010, Echternach et al 2011, Echternach et al 2011, Echternach et al 2012, Echternach et al 2014), but we were unable to locate sources in the literature that were related to brain mechanisms involved during register transitions. Here we report the vocal and neural responses (ERP) produced by changes in voice pitch auditory feedback that sounded to the subject as though their voice F0 was suddenly and unintentionally changing either from their modal register into another register (fry or head, referred to as “towards the register boundary”) or to a different pitch level within their modal register (referred to as “away from the register boundary”).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%