1960
DOI: 10.1121/1.1908107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between Loudness and Duration of Tonal Pulses. III. Response in Cases of Abnormal Loudness Function

Abstract: 486F. MISKOLCZY-FODOR the same principle. This observation proves the rather general validity of the concept concerning the direct correlation between loudness and time threshold. •,a 2. The regular relationship between tone duration and loudness will be altered if the energy distribution of the pure tone noticeably changes along the frequency axis. This is due to transients associated with shortening of the tonal pulse. Under these conditions, the loudness response is affected by the increased energy dissipat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in accord with the outcome of masked loudness measurements in normal ears (Chocholle & Greenbaum, 1966;Hellman & Zwislocki, 1964;Lochner & Burger, 1961;Scharf, 1964;S. S. Stevens & Guirao, 1967) and with group data determined by ears with sensorineural hearing loss (Miskolczy-Fodor, 1960), the results show that the slope of the loudness-recruitment function depends on the threshold of audibility; that is, the higher the threshold, the steeper the function. Both observers with a threshold at 66 dB SPL produce a function with a slope close to 1.0.…”
Section: Hearing Loss Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Finally, in accord with the outcome of masked loudness measurements in normal ears (Chocholle & Greenbaum, 1966;Hellman & Zwislocki, 1964;Lochner & Burger, 1961;Scharf, 1964;S. S. Stevens & Guirao, 1967) and with group data determined by ears with sensorineural hearing loss (Miskolczy-Fodor, 1960), the results show that the slope of the loudness-recruitment function depends on the threshold of audibility; that is, the higher the threshold, the steeper the function. Both observers with a threshold at 66 dB SPL produce a function with a slope close to 1.0.…”
Section: Hearing Loss Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Steeper loudness functions in the auditory system are known as ª loudness recruitmentº which is found in persons who have damage within the organ of Corti (Fowler, 1928;Steinberg and Gardner, 1937;Hellman and Zwislocki, 1964;Miskolczy-Fodor, 1964;Thalmann, 1965;Stevens and Guirao, 1967;Hellman, 1981). Stevens (1968) proposed that a loss of tactile sensitivity is the analogue of a hearing loss due to cochlear damage and that there should be a concomitant steepening of the curve of subjective magnitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stevens (1968) argued that the decrease of vibrotactile sensitivity at low frequencies was analogous to a loss of sensitivity due to peripheral damage at the cochlea. He reasoned that the growth of subjective sensitivity, therefore, should be more rapid at low frequencies, a phenomenon known as loudness recruitment in persons with damage within the organ of Corti (Fowler, 1928;Hellman, 1981;Hellman & Zwislocki, 1964;Miskolczy-Fodor, 1964;Pohlman & Kranz, 1924;Steinberg & Gardner, 1937;Stevens& Guirao, 1967;Thalmann, 1965). Loudness recruitment appears as a rapid growth of subjective intensity near threshold, but at higher stimulus intensities the curve approximates the normal loudness function.…”
Section: Subjective Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%