2019
DOI: 10.5546/aap.2019.eng.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between fluid overload and mortality in children with septic shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that fluid overload of > 10% was an independent predictor of pediatric sepsis mortality. This result was similar to a previous study with a study setting in a middle-resource country which showed that fluid overload percentage of > 10.1% in the first 96 h of sepsis patient care was associated with higher mortality in the first 28 days of care [ 13 ]. Moreover, this condition can be explained by the integration of the renal hemodynamic and physiological systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We showed that fluid overload of > 10% was an independent predictor of pediatric sepsis mortality. This result was similar to a previous study with a study setting in a middle-resource country which showed that fluid overload percentage of > 10.1% in the first 96 h of sepsis patient care was associated with higher mortality in the first 28 days of care [ 13 ]. Moreover, this condition can be explained by the integration of the renal hemodynamic and physiological systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our previous study considered FO to be a fluid accumulation (L) greater than 10% of initial body weight (kg), which is associated with the occurrence of AKI and increases the severity of AKI [ 13 ]. FO is also a major predictor of poor clinical outcomes [ 12 , 40 43 ]. A retrospective study showed that FO (≥ 10% L/kg) prolonged multiorgan failure based on the sub-SOFA score of the kidney in septic shock patients and increased 90-d mortality [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the authors did not have data on the amount of crystalloid administered prior to or after the initiation of vasoactive drugs, a factor that is known to have an impact on outcomes. 19 Additionally, although the present sample was satisfactory to evaluate and compare the two groups (with and without CCC), it does not provide us with the possibility of making comparisons between the subgroups due to the small sample size in each CCC category. Despite being a great result, the low mortality in the “without CCC” group (6 deaths) does not allow the predictive power for mortality of the VIS and PELOD-2 scores to be compared with due accuracy between the groups “CCC” and “without CCC”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%