1989
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90025-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between estrogen receptor concentration and clinical and histological factors: Their relative prognostic importance after radical mastectomy for primary breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…operable breast cancer whereas the traditional markers of tumour size and nodal status remained so. These observations are similar to those of other recent studies (Andry et al, 1989;Spyratos et al, 1989) as is the observation that prognostic significance recedes with time (Howell et al, 1984;Hahnel et al, 1979;Howat et al, 1983;Andry et al, 1989;Spyratos et al, 1989). These results contrast with the findings of our own earlier observations and those of other workers, particularly in the inability of receptor status to separate out a group of poor risk node negative patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…operable breast cancer whereas the traditional markers of tumour size and nodal status remained so. These observations are similar to those of other recent studies (Andry et al, 1989;Spyratos et al, 1989) as is the observation that prognostic significance recedes with time (Howell et al, 1984;Hahnel et al, 1979;Howat et al, 1983;Andry et al, 1989;Spyratos et al, 1989). These results contrast with the findings of our own earlier observations and those of other workers, particularly in the inability of receptor status to separate out a group of poor risk node negative patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Although some studies found that both disease free interval and overall prognosis were prolonged in receptor positive patients (Bishop et al, 1979;Osborne et al, 1980;Rich et al, 1978) others only noted an improvement in post-relapse survival (Hahnel et al, 1979;Hilf et al, 1980;Howell et al, 1984) and concluded that receptor status had only identified which patients were most likely to benefit from hormonal manipulation (Howell et al, 1984;Andry et al, 1989;Howat et al, 1985). Finally, other reports found improved survival only in certain sub-groups of patients, such as post-menopausal women or patients with axillary nodal involvement (Vollenweider-Zerargui et al, 1986;Bishop et al, 1979;Kinne et al, 1981 Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the relationship of oestrogen receptor status to survival, both individually and also stratified by nodal status.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that ER-negative tumours grow more aggressively and tend to metastasise more than ER-positive tumours (Andry et al, 1989;Winstanley et al, 1991). It is possible that hK10, a serine protease, may be associated with aggressiveness and metastatic potential of tumour cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because ER-negative tumor cells are less differentiated and more aggressive (15,36,37), a selection of ER-negative cells during the development of metastases might produce lower ER levels in metastatic lesions (33). On the other hand, more ERs in metastatic lymph nodes may result from different histologic patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the overall proportion of methylated ER genes is similar to that of ER-negative status amofig African-American patients (42%) [36], we will have 152 and 210 cases with methylated and unmethylated ER genes. An equal number (n=362) of controls will be selected.…”
Section: Sample Size and Study Powermentioning
confidence: 99%