2001
DOI: 10.1118/1.1357455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between carbon ion ranges and x‐ray CT numbers

Abstract: Measurements of carbon ion ranges in various phantom materials and real bones are presented. Together with measured Hounsfield values, an empirical relation between ranges and Hounsfield units is derived, which is an important prerequisite for treatment planning in carbon ion therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
103
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study shows very good results for intracranial cases there is no doubt that a lookup table of CT numbers with the developed scatter correction can still improve these results. In the case of carbon ion therapy, a difference of about 10 HU will result in a range uncertainty of about 1 mm [59]. Whereas for dose calculation for photons an uncertainty of 8% in electron density can lead to a dose uncertainty of only 1% for a 6 MV photon beam and the uncertainty in dose decreases with increasing energy [60].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As this study shows very good results for intracranial cases there is no doubt that a lookup table of CT numbers with the developed scatter correction can still improve these results. In the case of carbon ion therapy, a difference of about 10 HU will result in a range uncertainty of about 1 mm [59]. Whereas for dose calculation for photons an uncertainty of 8% in electron density can lead to a dose uncertainty of only 1% for a 6 MV photon beam and the uncertainty in dose decreases with increasing energy [60].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Table 3 shows the results of the CT scan, where the standard deviations comparable to that of water imply that they were actually homogeneous. We measured the relative stopping powers of the materials with the clinical carbon-ion beams at facility HIMAC (Kanai et al 1999) in a setup similar to those described by Schaffner and Pedroni (1998) and Jäkel et al (2001). The observed range shifts in table 3 by the materials in the box of 96-mm spacing resulted in relative stopping powers 0.818 for ethanol, 0.939 for olive oil, and 1.026 for milk.…”
Section: Carbon Range Verifications With Liquid Biological Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal beam-width is determined by the grid-spacing (uniform in x and y ) according to σ > 1.27 ( x i + 1 - x i ). To calculate the longitudinal extent ( z min - z max ) of the target, CT numbers are converted into particle ranges based on a Hounsfield look-up table [42]. Optimization of N ij is performed by least square minimization such that D ( x , y , z ) meets the prescribed dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%