2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1570299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between Amplitude and Duration of Acoustic Emission Signals

Abstract: The correlation between A and D in the AE signals coming from deformation tests in steel samples and explosion tests in Zry tubes is analysed. The graph for the logarithm of relative Amplitude versus Duration of AE signals is a band between two slightly convex lines. If each burst is a simple event a unique straight line is expected. Following a previous model of our Group, bursts were modelled as superposition of a number of events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acoustic emission from grating can be minimized by collecting and analyzing signals just around the peak load [2,9]. The spatial filtering techniques based on the source location, guard transducers [5,16] and time of arrival [17] can be employed to separate extraneous noise from crack bursts in laboratory testing to understand the mechanism of acoustic emission associated with crack growth behavior, based on the prediction that the crack initiates ahead of the notch tip and grows along the notch plane. However, the techniques used to minimize extraneous noise in laboratory testing may not be entirely applicable to acoustic emission bridge-monitoring because the crack location, the environmental noise and loading amplitudes can be less predictable in the field.…”
Section: Steel Bridge Monitoring With Acoustic Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic emission from grating can be minimized by collecting and analyzing signals just around the peak load [2,9]. The spatial filtering techniques based on the source location, guard transducers [5,16] and time of arrival [17] can be employed to separate extraneous noise from crack bursts in laboratory testing to understand the mechanism of acoustic emission associated with crack growth behavior, based on the prediction that the crack initiates ahead of the notch tip and grows along the notch plane. However, the techniques used to minimize extraneous noise in laboratory testing may not be entirely applicable to acoustic emission bridge-monitoring because the crack location, the environmental noise and loading amplitudes can be less predictable in the field.…”
Section: Steel Bridge Monitoring With Acoustic Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, for the search work of the end of the core of the hit, it is required to find the maximum value 𝑆𝑇𝐸 𝑚𝑎𝑥−𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 regarding to the provisional core of the hit (i.e., the range between STE[provisional onset hit] and STE[provisional end of the core of the hit]), to then readjust the Identification Lower Threshold (ITL) expressed in levels of energy (v 2 .s). For this, it is necessary to start from the fact that for the Acoustic Emission discipline one of the most accepted models [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] of an electrically transduced AE wave, considers to the wave as an underdamped sinusoidal function with the form:…”
Section: Yesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification Lower Threshold (ITL) expressed in levels of energy (v 2 .s). For this, it is necessary to start from the fact that for the Acoustic Emission discipline one of the most accepted models [65,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103] of an electrically transduced AE wave, considers to the wave as an underdamped sinusoidal function with the form:…”
Section: Ste[provisional Onset Hit] and Ste[provisional End Of The Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%