2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation Between Age and Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Findings from the Nationwide Readmission Database)

Abstract: It is unclear how age affects rates and causes of unplanned early readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed patients in the Nationwide Readmission Database in the United States from 2010 to 2014 and examined the impact of age on readmissions after PCI. The primary outcomes were age-specific 30-day rates and causes of unplanned readmissions. A total of 2,294,345 procedures were analyzed with a 9.6% unplanned readmission rate within 30 days. Unplanned readmissions were 8.1%, 8.1%, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…*1, 435. * and 436) 27–29. Across multiple hospitalisations, a patient could appear in more than one diagnosis group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*1, 435. * and 436) 27–29. Across multiple hospitalisations, a patient could appear in more than one diagnosis group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is emerging interest in unplanned readmissions, which is a burden to patients and healthcare services, as well as a quality metric 4 . There have been numerous reports on early hospital readmissions after PCI 5–8 and a more recent study of readmissions up to 180 days. There have been no sizable studies that have looked at the vulnerable populations with repeated readmissions after PCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In addition, recent advances in treatments of coronary artery disease (CAD) can prolong the patient's life and consequently, increase the likelihood of developing HF. [2][3][4] In such patients, coexisting left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is a particularly important determinant of clinical outcome, possibly through the increased likelihood of developing HF. 5,6 Similarly, survivors of severe CAD with LV systolic dysfunction have a relatively high incidence of subsequent hospitalization for HF, which is associated with significantly increased mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%