Developments in Mathematics
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23534-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating Two Genus 0 Problems of John Thompson

Abstract: Abstract. Excluding a precise list of groups like alternating, symmetric, cyclic and dihedral, from 1st year algebra ( §7.2.3), we expect there are only finitely many monodromy groups of primitive genus 0 covers. Denote this nearly proven genus 0 problem as Problem g=0 2 . We call the exceptional groups 0-sporadic. Example: Finitely many Chevalley groups are 0-sporadic. A proven result: Among polynomial 0-sporadic groups, precisely three produce covers falling in nontrivial reduced families. Each (miraculously… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is therefore led to study the Galois groups of primitive coverings X → P 1 with X general, and of genus zero coverings. There have been many developments on the genus zero problem: see [5][6][7]9,11]. As for the primitive generic case, in a series of papers [12][13][14][15] it is proven that, for any fixed g 4, the Galois group of a primitive covering f : X → P 1 , with X general in M g , is either A n or S n , with n > (g + 1)/2, a statement that strengthen Zariski's result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is therefore led to study the Galois groups of primitive coverings X → P 1 with X general, and of genus zero coverings. There have been many developments on the genus zero problem: see [5][6][7]9,11]. As for the primitive generic case, in a series of papers [12][13][14][15] it is proven that, for any fixed g 4, the Galois group of a primitive covering f : X → P 1 , with X general in M g , is either A n or S n , with n > (g + 1)/2, a statement that strengthen Zariski's result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%