2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.034014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating transverse-momentum-dependent and collinear factorization theorems in a generalized formalism

Abstract: We construct an improved implementation for combining transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) factorization and collinear factorization. TMD factorization is suitable for low transverse momentum physics, while collinear factorization is suitable for high transverse momenta and for a cross section integrated over transverse momentum. The result is a modified version of the standard W + Y prescription traditionally used in the Collins-Soper-Sterman (CSS) formalism and related approaches. We further argue that questi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
113
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we focus on the simplest ones, i.e., the unpolarized TMD PDF f q 1 (x, k 2 ⊥ ) and the unpolarized TMD FF D q→h 1 (z, P 2 ⊥ ), where z is the fractional energy carried by the detected hadron h, k ⊥ is the transverse momentum of the parton with respect to the parent hadron, and P ⊥ is the transverse momentum of the produced hadron with respect to the parent parton. Despite their simplicity, the phenomenology of these unpolarized TMDs presents several challenges [22]: the choice of a functional form for the nonperturbative components of TMDs, the inclusion of a possible dependence on partonic flavor [23], the implementation of TMD evolution [4,24], the matching to fixed-order calculations in collinear factorization [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus on the simplest ones, i.e., the unpolarized TMD PDF f q 1 (x, k 2 ⊥ ) and the unpolarized TMD FF D q→h 1 (z, P 2 ⊥ ), where z is the fractional energy carried by the detected hadron h, k ⊥ is the transverse momentum of the parton with respect to the parent hadron, and P ⊥ is the transverse momentum of the produced hadron with respect to the parent parton. Despite their simplicity, the phenomenology of these unpolarized TMDs presents several challenges [22]: the choice of a functional form for the nonperturbative components of TMDs, the inclusion of a possible dependence on partonic flavor [23], the implementation of TMD evolution [4,24], the matching to fixed-order calculations in collinear factorization [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall normalization, however, cancels in the analysis of the relative twist content so the small discrepancy of this parameter does not prohibit using this model in the twist analysis. Note that in the q T integrated cross sections the effects of the CSS resummation cancel [48].…”
Section: Jhep01(2017)005mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was shown by Collins, Sterman and Soper (CSS) [47] that in the relevant small q T region these corrections may be resummed or parameterized by a universal non-perturbative transverse momentum dependent parton distribution at very small q T . It was proven that the contribution of the resummed corrections of this type cancel after q T integrations [48], but it is essential for the correct description of the Drell-Yan q T -dependent cross section at small q T . Recently the problem of joint resummation of small x effects and the transverse momentum logarithms was addressed [49,50] providing important results for analyses of the q T dependent DY distribution at small x.…”
Section: Jhep01(2017)005mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the TMD evolution the asymptotic nullification of the moment of TMD pdf much discussed here [7] means the violation of positivity for large Q T . One may understand that as a reversal of scale arrow at Q T ∼ Q which is also supported by the sign change of the corresponding log.…”
Section: Kinetic Evolution and Scale Arrowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may understand that as a reversal of scale arrow at Q T ∼ Q which is also supported by the sign change of the corresponding log. The substitution of W by Y term [7] may be interpreted as a restoration of the direction of scale arrow.…”
Section: Kinetic Evolution and Scale Arrowsmentioning
confidence: 99%