2014
DOI: 10.4312/linguistica.54.1.293-308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating the Slovenian secondary school English language national examinations to the CEFR: findings and implications

Abstract: The present paper draws on the report of a five-year project that aligned the Slovenian national exams in English to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). Discussed here are the key findings of the relating project, carried out by the National Examination Centre, a central institution for external assessment in Slovenia, for the following exams: the Vocational Matura (for technical secondary schools, vocational-technical schools, and vocational courses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Slovene General Matura in English has been aligned with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR; Council of Europe 2001) as a B2-level examination. The alignment project is presented and validated inIlc & Stopar (2015), as well as inIlc et al (2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Slovene General Matura in English has been aligned with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR; Council of Europe 2001) as a B2-level examination. The alignment project is presented and validated inIlc & Stopar (2015), as well as inIlc et al (2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Slovenia, the national highstakes examinations, including the GM, are neither piloted nor pre-tested (Ilc, Rot Gabrovec, and Stopar 2014;Šifrar Kalan and Trenc 2014). Consequently, the itemwriters, test-developers and (CEFR) alignment experts must solely rely on their subjective judgment regarding the item/task difficulty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%