2015
DOI: 10.3791/52738-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm if the gas exchange measurements were under light saturation, which would be assumed for sunlit leaves, we compared the PAR values during measurement days to a PAR value above which photosynthetic rates saturate in some tropical trees. A previous study showed that the PAR value at which photosynthetic rate in some tropical tree species reached saturation was approximately 800 µmol m -2 s -1 [26][27][28]. The result showed that PAR values on the measurement days were significantly higher than the PAR value for light-saturated photosynthesis (p < 0.001, one-sample t-test).…”
Section: ) Plant Materials and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To confirm if the gas exchange measurements were under light saturation, which would be assumed for sunlit leaves, we compared the PAR values during measurement days to a PAR value above which photosynthetic rates saturate in some tropical trees. A previous study showed that the PAR value at which photosynthetic rate in some tropical tree species reached saturation was approximately 800 µmol m -2 s -1 [26][27][28]. The result showed that PAR values on the measurement days were significantly higher than the PAR value for light-saturated photosynthesis (p < 0.001, one-sample t-test).…”
Section: ) Plant Materials and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The flow rate was set to 250 ml min -1 (TARGAS-1 Portable Photosynthesis System Operation Manual Version 1.04 2018). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; µmol m -2 s -1 ) inside the cuvette was set to 1,500 µmol m -2 s -1 , which corresponded to the light saturation ranges in tropical trees [26][27][28]. Atmospheric temperature, relative humidity and CO2 concentration were not controlled and thus tracking ambient conditions.…”
Section: ) Plant Materials and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kohlrabi had a lower LDMC than apple, but their LMA was similar. LDMC as a functional leaf trait reflects physiological functions, such as transpiration, and is a valid predictor for the parameters of stomatal regulation (Krober et al 2015). A higher LDMC enables a plant to keep the integrity of the leaf even at low moisture and might be linked to the different transpiration responses of the crop species to the adjuvant application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore possible to estimate the operational stomatal conductance ( g op ) of extinct fossil plants to both CO 2 ( g CO2 ) and water vapor ( g H2O ; 1.6 times g CO2 ) using the g max trait (McElwain et al ., 2016). As functional plant traits, g max and g op provide vital insights into a fossil plant's likely ecological strategy within a paleo‐community as g op correlates strongly with photosynthetic rate (reviewed in Berry et al ., 2010; Medlyn et al ., 2011) and other key traits in the leaf economic spectrum (Kröber et al ., 2015) including LMA (Soh et al ., 2019; Wu et al ., 2020), LNC (Schulze et al ., 1994; Juhrbandt et al ., 2004), and LL (Poorter & Bongers, 2006), and also whole plant WUE (Soh et al ., 2019). Based on the relative ease with which g max can be measured across various modes of plant fossil preservation (McElwain & Steinthorsdottir, 2017) and the fact that it constrains understanding of paleo‐productivity (Franks & Beerling, 2009; Wilson et al ., 2015; McElwain et al ., 2016), the hydrological cycle at local to global levels (Steinthorsdottir et al ., 2012; Jasechko et al ., 2013; White et al ., 2020), and fossil plant WUE (Reichgelt et al ., 2020), we evaluate it here as a paleo‐plant functional trait with strong potential application to a range of research questions relating to plant–climate and plant–atmosphere evolution and Earth system processes in general (Matthaeus et al ., 2023).…”
Section: Fossil Leaf Functional Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%