1989
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1989)028<0252:rptaar>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating Point to Area Average Rainfall in Semiarid West Africa and the Implications for Rainfall Estimates Derived from Satellite Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As differences are calculated for the TAMSAT rainfall estimate S minus the gauge observation G (Table 2), negative values indicate relative underestimation and positive values indicate relative overestimation of rainfall by TAMSAT. Although differences between point and pixel rainfall over larger 10-day totals decline substantially and are very much dependent on the particular storm characteristics, these are shown to be as much as 35% (12.5 in 36 mm) in a case study in Niger (Flitcroft et al 1989). The 210-to 10-mm difference thus represents the difference expected from the point-to-area comparison, although this can be much higher depending on the frequency distributions of particular storms (Flitcroft et al 1989).…”
Section: ) Operational Validation Of Dekadal Rainfall Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As differences are calculated for the TAMSAT rainfall estimate S minus the gauge observation G (Table 2), negative values indicate relative underestimation and positive values indicate relative overestimation of rainfall by TAMSAT. Although differences between point and pixel rainfall over larger 10-day totals decline substantially and are very much dependent on the particular storm characteristics, these are shown to be as much as 35% (12.5 in 36 mm) in a case study in Niger (Flitcroft et al 1989). The 210-to 10-mm difference thus represents the difference expected from the point-to-area comparison, although this can be much higher depending on the frequency distributions of particular storms (Flitcroft et al 1989).…”
Section: ) Operational Validation Of Dekadal Rainfall Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This partially relates to the optimizing of TAMSAT calibrations for detecting the median rainfall event, whereas point-to-pixel validation effectively compares rainfall estimates against mean gauge observations. Although the point-to-pixel validation method used here introduces a dry bias, which is representative of the point-to-pixel mismatch in estimating rainfall over an area, using the median is more appropriate than the mean for deriving area-averaged rainfall estimates (Flitcroft et al 1989). Figure 6 highlights that TAMSAT has skill outside the main rainy season over parts of southern Africa in both April and August, which is important because in some African regions there can be a secondary rainy season and/or rain events during the dry season that are crucial for crop growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the error attributable to the gauge data is concerned, a detailed investigation by Flitcroft et al (1989) has demonstrated that raingauge measurements of convective rainfall events in the Sahel typically vary by more than 50% within a single pixel. However, the present study is concerned only with the variability of the rainfall/CCD relationship attributable to different weather regimes.…”
Section: General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vastness of the area and the rapid development of weather patterns within the Inter-tropical Convergence Zone present a multitude of problems in obtaining accurate ground measurement of rainfall using traditional meteorological tools. Patterns of rainfall in the Sahel show considerable spatial variability over relatively short distances and rain gauges across the region are too sparsely placed to yield consistently reliable data (Flitcroft et a/., 1989). In much of the Sahel, there may be only one rain gauge per 10 000 km 2 .…”
Section: Rainfall Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%