Abstract:Creativity is a complex construct that is conceptualized and measured in multiple ways. This study examined the relationship between creativity and personality taking this into account. It was hypothesized that applying different conceptions and measures would cause variation in the creativity–personality relationship. The participants (N = 224) were undergraduate students and completed six creativity measures, a personality inventory, and a demographic questionnaire. Personality predicted more creative produc… Show more
“…Contrary with what was expected, the association between Openness and Creativity is not moderated by GO. Nevertheless, that finding does support previous findings showing that Openness is the strongest predictor of creativity (Dollinger et al., ; George & Zhou, ; McCrae, ; Puryear et al., ). The current findings show that Openness is unconditionally associated with creativity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Openness is the personality dimension that is the most strongly tied to creativity (Dollinger et al, 2004;George & Zhou, 2001;Jauk, Benedek, & Neubauer, 2014;McCrae, 1987;Puryear, Kettler, & Rinn, 2017). As Helson (1999) put it: Openness is a "cardinal characteristic" of creativity.…”
This study examined the association between the big five personality dimensions and creativity through the moderation of motivational goal orientation. One hundred and ninety students engaged in full‐time employment completed questionnaires, which were used to assess the variables of interest. Regression moderation analyses supported some of the expected hypotheses. The associations between the big five dimensions and creativity were moderated by learning motivational goal orientation. Individuals high in extroversion, emotional stability, and low in conscientiousness, are most creative when they are oriented toward learning. In addition, openness fully predicted creativity, without the moderation of goal orientation. The results are discussed in terms of the interactional nature of personality and goal orientation theory.
“…Contrary with what was expected, the association between Openness and Creativity is not moderated by GO. Nevertheless, that finding does support previous findings showing that Openness is the strongest predictor of creativity (Dollinger et al., ; George & Zhou, ; McCrae, ; Puryear et al., ). The current findings show that Openness is unconditionally associated with creativity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Openness is the personality dimension that is the most strongly tied to creativity (Dollinger et al, 2004;George & Zhou, 2001;Jauk, Benedek, & Neubauer, 2014;McCrae, 1987;Puryear, Kettler, & Rinn, 2017). As Helson (1999) put it: Openness is a "cardinal characteristic" of creativity.…”
This study examined the association between the big five personality dimensions and creativity through the moderation of motivational goal orientation. One hundred and ninety students engaged in full‐time employment completed questionnaires, which were used to assess the variables of interest. Regression moderation analyses supported some of the expected hypotheses. The associations between the big five dimensions and creativity were moderated by learning motivational goal orientation. Individuals high in extroversion, emotional stability, and low in conscientiousness, are most creative when they are oriented toward learning. In addition, openness fully predicted creativity, without the moderation of goal orientation. The results are discussed in terms of the interactional nature of personality and goal orientation theory.
“…A few studies in the past decade have tried to investigate the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and two types of creativity, namely, divergent thinking and insight problem solving. However, the results are inconsistent (e.g., Lin et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2013;Puryear et al, 2019). These results suggest divergent thinking and insight problem solving involve different cognitive processes and have a different relationship with personality traits; insight problem solving may involve more conscious cognitive processes than divergent thinking.…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
Priming effect is, in a great part, an implicit learning mechanism; it may influence insight problem solving both consciously and unconsciously. The present study investigates interactions between personality traits and priming effects in insight problem solving involving novel object associations in complex situations over time. Based on the findings of past literature, a two-path (conscious vs. unconscious process) model exploring the moderation effects of two personality traits (emotional creativity and Big Five personality traits) were analyzed in this study. One hundred and fifteen college students participated in a randomized block design experiment (nonprimed vs. primed) which included three runs of insight problem solving. During the experiment, the participants were exposed to partially direct priming with recognition memory tasks that associated novel objects (associative response priming) and then were challenged by situationbased insight problems; the interaction effects of priming manipulation and personality traits on insight problem solving were analyzed. The results showed that emotional creativity as well as extraversion, openness to experience, neuroticism, and conscientiousness play important moderating roles during the processes of insight problem solving when associative response priming was offered. Overall, the priming effects as well as the moderating effects of these personality traits on insight problem solving grew over time. The findings suggest that insight problem solving, although largely governed by an implicit learning mechanism, involves both conscious and unconscious cognitive processes; moreover, mindfulness, focused attention, persistence, positive emotion, and flexible thinking can be important mechanisms that facilitate insight problem solving in primed situations.
“…"creativity" is a broad term which can be analyzed from the perspective of four paradigms. in its attributive dimension, we are dealing with "creativity" when the result of the act of creation is something new, useful and valuable in a given historical, cultural and political context (Kasof 1995;Runco & Jaeger , 2012;Sethy , 2009;acar & Runco , 2014;Barbot, 2018Barbot, , 2019tien, chang & Kuo, 2019;puryear, Kettler & Rinn, 2019; Education and Self development. Volume 14, № 3, 2019 creative commons by the authors is licenced under cc-BY-N c-N d Runco & Beghetto, 2019).…”
Section: Creativity As a Personal Characteristic -Theoretical Assumptmentioning
The aim of this research was to evaluate the relationship between the level of creative thinking in pedagogy students and their internal need to learn about the world and themselves. a quantitative research strategy was employed. The research sample numbered 250 participants. The questionnaire need for cognition Scale-ncS was used to measure the need for cognition (nfc). The test for creative Thinking, drawing production-tct-dp, test sheets a and B were used to measure creativity. The results of the research revealed the existence of relationships between creativity and the need for cognition in pedagogy students. The analysis enabled an outline of the directions in which university education might develop in order to foster students' need for cognition as a precondition for creative activity. finally, the study delineated the limitations and perspectives for future research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.