2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating individual differences in nicotine dependence severity to underpinning motivational and pharmacological processes among smokers from vulnerable populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study was conducted with the primary aim of examining the factor-loading pattern of a hypothetical CPT in a sample of pregnant women who smoke. The present study revealed a two-factor solution, interpreted as amplitude and persistence, consistent with prior research conducted in other populations including vulnerable populations (e.g., economically disadvantaged women, Higgins et al, 2020; adults with opioid use disorder, Higgins et al, 2020; adults with affective disorders, González-Roz et al, 2020; Higgins et al, 2020; adults with alcohol use disorder, Cui et al, 2021; and adolescents, Bidwell et al, 2012). O max and intensity loaded onto amplitude where all other indices and O max loaded onto persistence in the present study, which is largely consistent with prior studies where only intensity or intensity and O max loaded onto amplitude and all of the other indices loaded onto persistence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study was conducted with the primary aim of examining the factor-loading pattern of a hypothetical CPT in a sample of pregnant women who smoke. The present study revealed a two-factor solution, interpreted as amplitude and persistence, consistent with prior research conducted in other populations including vulnerable populations (e.g., economically disadvantaged women, Higgins et al, 2020; adults with opioid use disorder, Higgins et al, 2020; adults with affective disorders, González-Roz et al, 2020; Higgins et al, 2020; adults with alcohol use disorder, Cui et al, 2021; and adolescents, Bidwell et al, 2012). O max and intensity loaded onto amplitude where all other indices and O max loaded onto persistence in the present study, which is largely consistent with prior studies where only intensity or intensity and O max loaded onto amplitude and all of the other indices loaded onto persistence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the present study, we explore the latent-factor structure of the CPT indices via principal component analysis. A two-factor solution has been reported in prior studies in large (O’Connor et al, 2016; N = 1,194) and smaller (Athamneh et al, 2019; N = 119) samples of adult smokers from the general population (e.g., “daily adult cigarette smokers”) and a large sample of adult smokers[from vulnerable populations ( N = 745; Higgins et al, 2020)]. Wherein intensity loaded exclusively onto amplitude, defined as volumetric consumption or expenditure in total volume, and all other indices loaded exclusively onto persistence, defined as consumption as a function of price.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, no studies have examined demand amplitude ( Q 0 ) and cross-commodity delay discounting of substances in clinical populations, but several studies have found that demand amplitude is correlated with addiction severity (e.g., Aston et al, 2017; Higgins et al, 2020) and addiction severity is negatively correlated with the rate of discounting, consistent with the implications of the simulation shown in Figure 12. For example, Naudé et al (2021) found that alcohol use severity had a significantly negative correlation with delay discount rate when the delayed larger commodity was alcohol but a significant positive correlation with discount rate when the delayed larger commodity was money, and no correlation to discount rate for money versus money.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“… 10 , 11 , 12 Secondary CPD outcomes included changes in total, study, and nonstudy CPD across weeks. Other secondary outcomes included nicotine dependence severity based on Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence 28 total scores (minus CPD item) and Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (Brief WISDM) total and primary dependence motive and secondary dependence motive subscale scores, 29 breath CO, 30 urinary cotinine and NNAL (marker of tobacco-specific n-nitrosamine exposure) level, 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 Cigarette Purchase Task, 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 smoking topography, 40 craving or withdrawal using Questionnaire on Smoking Urges Brief (QSU-Brief) 41 and Minnesota Tobacco Withdrawal Scale 42 scores, and during-study and poststudy abstinence outcomes. 10 , 12 , 27 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%