Relating in executive coaching: a behavioural systems approach

Abstract

Purpose -In recent research the strength and nature of the relationship between coaches and executives appears as a critical success factor in successful coaching outcomes. However, little theory has as yet been devoted to an analysis of how relationships are used in executive coaching. Such an analysis requires going from the monadic, individual level of analysis to the dyadic, relational level. The purpose of this paper is to develop a theory of relating in executive coaching at this dyadic level of analysis. Design/methodology/approach -A conceptual analysis of relating in executive coaching is presented, drawing on a combination of the behavioural approach (Skinner and others) and the systems approach (Bateson and others). A verbatim of a coaching conversation serves as an illustration. Findings -It is found that the behavioural and systems approaches may be fruitfully combined in one behavioural systems approach. Following this, relating in executive coaching is characterised as systemic, behavioural, communicational, and patterned. Originality/value -The paper is among the first to study executive coaching at the dyadic level of analysis, and to develop a combined behavioural systems approach towards that purpose. This approach and its outcomes add to and can be clearly distinguished from the more common humanistic, psychodynamic, and cognitive approaches to executive coaching.

Leadership development trends and challenges in the twenty-first century: rethinking the priorities

“…Barner and Higgins (2007) point out that coaches tend to focus on one of four prevailing coaching models: the clinical model, the behavioral model, the systems model and the social constructionist model, which shape the approaches that organization development practitioners take in directing coaching assessments and interventions. Much of the coaching literature reveals that research on coaching focuses on its outcome, such as the dynamic of the relationship between coach and client and effective coaching outcomes (Critchley, 2010;Visser, 2010); the relationship between both rapport and commitment and coaching effectiveness (Gan and Chong, 2015); the roles of the coach's enforcement of standards and the coach's empathy for the coaching practice (Ben Salem and Lakhal, 2018); the role of coaching in supporting and enhancing the quality of the sensemaking activities of the individual (Du Toit, 2007); the role of the intensity of the coaching practice as a tacit evaluating tool for organizational functioning (Ben-Hador, 2016); the relationship between coachee characteristics and sustainable development and innovation (Bozer et al, 2013); and the relationship between leadership coaching and constructive leadership behaviors (Anthony, 2017). In addition, coaching was conceptualized as an effective approach to leadership development (e.g.…”

The impact of common factors on coaching outcomes

“…Despite different taxonomies of common factors , the general consensus is that the coaching relationship is the most important predictor of coaching outcomes (de Haan et al, 2011;Ely et al, 2010;Visser, 2010). Grassman et al's (2020) recent meta-analysis synthesised 27 studies (N=3563 coaching processes) and found a significant positive overall aggregated correlation between working alliance and coaching outcomes.…”

Una Experiencia De Coaching en Estudiantes Universitarios

“…, 2007;Franckeiss, 2009;Grant, 2011;Moen y Allgood, 2009;Newsom y Dent, 2011;Visser, 2010) se describen los siguientes aspectos.…”