2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlap.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating fair testing and accordance for service replaceability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we are interested in using such representations to decide the coarsest precongruences. Another issue is the minimal requirement weak termination (e.g., [21,23]): Reaching a final state should always be possible. This criterion is very close to the idea of should testing, but it is not clear how to characterize the respective accordance (which is a precongruence itself).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we are interested in using such representations to decide the coarsest precongruences. Another issue is the minimal requirement weak termination (e.g., [21,23]): Reaching a final state should always be possible. This criterion is very close to the idea of should testing, but it is not clear how to characterize the respective accordance (which is a precongruence itself).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That standard language inclusion can be too strict has been observed for a stronger criterion than b-responsiveness in [21,5,23]. Mooij et al [23] propose two solutions to overcome this problem.…”
Section: A Trace-based Semantics For Bounded Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We showed undecidability of accordance for five behavioral properties: deadlock freedom [3] and responsiveness [4]-both with and without final markings-and weak termination [5].…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A natural question is whether this previously known bound is necessary. In this paper, we give a negative answer: We prove that accordance is undecidable for deadlock freedom and responsiveness-both with and without final statesand weak termination [5] (i.e., the perpetual possibility to reach a final state).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%