1996
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030025x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating Extractable Soil Phosphorus to Phosphorus Losses in Runoff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

29
464
6
12

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 601 publications
(511 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
29
464
6
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedures for agronomic soil P tests, FeP, and WP were described by Frank et al (1998), Menon et al (1989) and Sharpley (1993), and Pote et al (1996), respectively.…”
Section: Soil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedures for agronomic soil P tests, FeP, and WP were described by Frank et al (1998), Menon et al (1989) and Sharpley (1993), and Pote et al (1996), respectively.…”
Section: Soil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental soil phosphorus tests that involve water extraction routinely use air-dried soils and only measure inorganic phosphorus (e.g. [73,74]). The results of these tests will clearly vary depending on the moisture status of the soil prior to extraction and on the inclusion (or not) of organic phosphorus.…”
Section: Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil P tests often use strong chemical extractants, which may overestimate potential P loss in runoff waters from manure-applied soils, because CaÁP minerals that are insoluble in water are dissolved by the extractant (Sharpley et al 2004). For environmental purposes the distilled water extraction is useful for predicting mobile P fractions because it can accurately estimate the saturation concentration of the P adsorption complex (Atia and Mallarino 2002), and has shown a high correlation (r 2 00.82**) with dissolved P in runoff (Pote et al 1996). The water extraction method is considered to accurately simulate the effect of rainfall and provide the best estimate of P loss potential (Wright et al 2003); however, results from Alberta, Canada, indicate that agronomic-based P tests, like the Modified Kelowna (MK) method, were more useful in detecting build-up, at lower ranges of soil P (Wright et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%