Relating DSM-5 section II and section III personality disorder diagnostic classification systems to treatment planning

Morey, Leslie C.; Benson, Kathryn T.

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.03.010

Cited by 28 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The pathological traits of the DSM-5 AMPD have been found to be superior to the DSM-IV-TR/DSM-5 PD categories with respect to clinicians’ ratings of ease of use, communication with patients, usefulness for describing an individual’s personality problems and global personality, and treatment planning [38]. Furthermore, the DSM-5 AMPD predicts treatment decisions (e.g., level of treatment, type of psychotherapeutic or pharmacological treatment) better than the DSM-IV-TR/DSM-5 PD categories [36]. Examples of how the DSM-5 AMPD can be used in clinical practice are provided by Skodol, Morey, Bender, and Oldham [44] and Bach, Markon, Simonsen, and Krueger [11].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWith the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), an alternative model for personality disorders based on personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits was introduced. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a 220-item self-report inventory designed to assess the personality traits of this model. Recently, a short 100-item version of the PID-5 (PID-5-SF) has been developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the score reliability and structure of the Norwegian PID-5-SF. Further, criterion validity with the five factor model of personality (FFM) and pathological personality beliefs was examined.MethodsA derivation sample of university students (N = 503) completed the PID-5, the Big Five Inventory (BFI), and the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire – Short Form (PBQ-SF), whereas a replication sample of 127 students completed the PID-5-SF along with the aforementioned measures.ResultsThe short PID-5 showed overall good score reliability and structural validity. The associations with FFM traits and pathological personality beliefs were conceptually coherent and similar for the two forms of the PID-5.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the Norwegian PID-5 short form is a reliable and efficient measure of the trait criterion of the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies have been conducted demonstrating the incremental validity of maladaptive traits above and beyond DSM-5 section II PDs when predicting treatment planning [278], general PD severity [279], disability [235], social cognition deficits [280], and aggression [244]. Some research focused on the incremental validity of selected trait facets above and beyond specific PDs when predicting external criterion variables [236,281,282].…”

Section: Incremental Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

Zimmermann

Kerber

Kappelmann

et al. 2019

Curr Psychiatry Rep

252

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Both the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the chapter on personality disorders (PD) in the recent version of ICD-11 embody a shift from a categorical to a dimensional paradigm for the classification of PD. We describe these new models, summarize available measures, and provide a comprehensive review of research on the AMPD. Recent Findings A total of 237 publications on severity (criterion A) and maladaptive traits (criterion B) of the AMPD indicate (a) acceptable interrater reliability, (b) largely consistent latent structures, (c) substantial convergence with a range of theoretically and clinically relevant external measures, and (d) some evidence for incremental validity when controlling for categorical PD diagnoses. However, measures of criterion A and B are highly correlated, which poses conceptual challenges. Summary The AMPD has stimulated extensive research with promising findings. We highlight open questions and provide recommendations for future research.

show abstract

“…Additionally, the PID-5 has proven its ability to capture the DSM-5 Section II PDs categories and symptoms [ 20 ], and other studies claimed its utility for treatment planning [ 21 ], as well as predicting psychosocial impairment [ 22 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Coelho¹,

Pires²,

Ferreira³

et al. 2020

CPEMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) proposes a model for conceptualizing personality disorders in which they are characterized by impairments in personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of these maladaptive personality traits. Objective: The current study examined the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to measure maladaptive personality traits in the Emirati population of the United Arab Emirates. Methods: The Arabic version of the PID-5 was administered to a community sample of 1,090 United Arab Emirates nationals (89.5% female and 10.5% male, mean age = 22.44 years old). The descriptive measures, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity with NEO – Five Factor Inventory, as well as PID-5’s factor structure, were all addressed. Results: The PID-5facets and domains mean scores were higher in the Emirati sample compared to the original US sample. Internal consistency of the PID-5 scales was acceptable to high and test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.84 (facets) to 0.87 (domains). As expected, the five domains of the Arabic version of the PID-5 correlated significantly with all Five-Factor Model domains of personality. Additionally, the Arabic version of the PID-5 confirmed a five-factor structure that resembles the PID-5 domains. Conclusion: The findings of this study provided initial support for the use of the Arabic version of the PID-5 to assess maladaptive personality traits in the Emirati population of the United Arab Emirates.

show abstract

Relating DSM-5 section II and section III personality disorder diagnostic classification systems to treatment planning

Cited by 28 publications

References 27 publications

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About