2002
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating covariant and canonical approaches to triangulated models of quantum gravity

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper explore the relation between covariant and canonical approaches to quantum gravity and BF theory. We will focus on the dynamical triangulation and spin-foam models, which have in common that they can be defined in terms of sums over space-time triangulations. Our aim is to show how we can recover these covariant models from a canonical framework by providing two regularisations of the projector onto the kernel of the Hamiltonian constraint. This link is important for the understanding o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A final interesting question arises: can one construct from the ideas presented here a canonical formulation of Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) (see also [45])? Given that a priori all new lengths in 4D canonical Regge calculus can be freely chosen and, in particular, all be fixed equal to one while the births of baby universes are disallowed, can one construct 'classical CDT solutions' from this, such that the pre-and post-constraints determine the connectivity by rejecting or accepting certain Pachner moves?…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final interesting question arises: can one construct from the ideas presented here a canonical formulation of Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) (see also [45])? Given that a priori all new lengths in 4D canonical Regge calculus can be freely chosen and, in particular, all be fixed equal to one while the births of baby universes are disallowed, can one construct 'classical CDT solutions' from this, such that the pre-and post-constraints determine the connectivity by rejecting or accepting certain Pachner moves?…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if a unitary operator has all nonnegative matrix elements in some basis it must be rather trivial, simply acting as a permutation of the basis. However, thanks to the 'problem of time' in quantum gravity, it is more natural to use a sum over spin foams to compute, not a time evolution operator, but the projection from the space spanned by spin networks onto the physical Hilbert space of quantum gravity [4,25]. There is no reason for this to be unitary; it should be something more like a positive operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], in fact, a discretization of the projector operator was proposed, leading to an expression very close to that provided by spin foam models.…”
Section: The Barrett-crane Model As a Realization Of The Projector Opmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The expression above is then interpreted as a sum over triangulations and the operators U ǫ,l , being (a sum over) local evolution operators, implement the action of the projector operator on a given spin network and are identified with the quantum operators corresponding to given Pachner moves in the spin foam case [23]. The integral over T is then the analogue of the integral over the algebraic variables in the spin foam model.…”
Section: The Barrett-crane Model As a Realization Of The Projector Opmentioning
confidence: 99%