2013
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating Changes in Cometary Rotation to Activity: Current Status and Applications to Comet C/2012 S1 (Ison)

Abstract: We introduce a parameter, X, to predict the changes in the rotational period of a comet in terms of the rotational period itself, the nuclear radius, and the orbital characteristics. We show that X should be a constant if the bulk densities and shapes of nuclei are nearly identical and the activity patterns are similar for all comets. For four nuclei for which rotational changes are well documented, despite the nearly factor 30 variation observed among the effective active fractions of these comets, X is const… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not surprising that the change for 67P is similar to that for 9P, a comet of similar size and activity level, although with a considerably longer rotation period (41 h). Samarasinha & Mueller (2013) compared the four comets with observed spinrate changes and their activity level, and found that an approximately constant factor (within a factor of two) links them and allows the change of rotation rate to be predicted based on the size, period, and orbit of the comet, and that the changes should be independent of the active fraction of the surface area. The measurement for 67P is two to three times larger than this analysis predicted (Samarasinha, priv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not surprising that the change for 67P is similar to that for 9P, a comet of similar size and activity level, although with a considerably longer rotation period (41 h). Samarasinha & Mueller (2013) compared the four comets with observed spinrate changes and their activity level, and found that an approximately constant factor (within a factor of two) links them and allows the change of rotation rate to be predicted based on the size, period, and orbit of the comet, and that the changes should be independent of the active fraction of the surface area. The measurement for 67P is two to three times larger than this analysis predicted (Samarasinha, priv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations for the runaway mass loss include the loss of icy glue holding sections of the nucleus together, build up of subsurface pressure which was eventually released through one or more catastrophic outbursts, or splitting via rotational spin-up (Samarasinha & Mueller 2013). Significant mass loss was not likely triggered by tidal forces, which should not have become significant until the day of perihelion (Knight & Walsh 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other observations, e.g., SOHO-UVCS or STEREO-SECCHI EUVI imaging spectroscopy, are of too short duration and of comets in an even harsher solar environment, and are therefore less likely to reveal rotation periods. Samarasinha and Mueller (2013) showed that near-Sun comets can have their rotation periods significantly altered and can be excited into non-principal axis rotation by the high outgassing rates near perihelion. Drahus (2014) argued that increasing coma optical depth could mitigate this to some extent, but nonetheless found that rotational disruption might explain the high frequency of destruction of long-period comets with q < 0.5 AU noted by Bortle (1991).…”
Section: Rotation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events are not well explained but one leading explanation is rotational break-up due to spin-up from asymmetric outgassing on the nucleus, which may have been responsible for C/2012 S1 ISON's apparent breakup prior to perihelion (e.g., Samarasinha and Mueller 2013). Sekanina (2000Sekanina ( , 2002a used the motions of pairs of temporally clustered Kreutz comets to argue that non-tidal fragmentation occurs at very large heliocentric distances (tens of AU) in addition to tidal fragmentation near perihelion.…”
Section: Other Potential Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%