1972
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2828(72)90036-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Related satellite DNA's in the genus Mus*1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of closely related species of Drosophila (33,34), primates (18), and rodents (17,20,26), again, have demonstrated that within each cluster, the distinction between species resides in the amount of repeated DNA. The sequence of this fraction of DNA, at least in mice (38), is instead remarkably stable. The molecular basis of the differences in the DNA amount observed in this study has not been established yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Comparisons of closely related species of Drosophila (33,34), primates (18), and rodents (17,20,26), again, have demonstrated that within each cluster, the distinction between species resides in the amount of repeated DNA. The sequence of this fraction of DNA, at least in mice (38), is instead remarkably stable. The molecular basis of the differences in the DNA amount observed in this study has not been established yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, controversy exists about the importance of other mechanisms, such as gene amplification (Walsch 1987), replication slippage (Stephan 1989), and sudden large-scale amplification (Britten and Kohne 1986;Sutton and McCallum 1972). Bacteriophage )~ clone inserts containing repetitive DNAs are known to be unstable, suggesting an ongoing dynamic process (Arnheim and Kuehn 1979;Collins and Rubin 1983;Levis and Rubin 1982;Kiyama et al 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the distribution pattern of DAPIpositive heterochromatin fluorescence staining by counterstaining with distamycin A-DAPI provides information about the relationship between sequence differences of satellite DNA and distamycin A-DAPI positive heterochromatin (Schweizer et al 1978;Schwarzacher-Robinson et al 1988). The difference in satellite DNA sequence, its abundance between Mus species and the distribution of satellite DNA sequence among various chromosomes have been previously described (Sutton and McCallum 1972;Rice and Straus 1973). Brown and Dover (1980) analyzed the satellite DNA content in M. spretus with Hoechst 33258-CSC1 density centrifugation methods and found that there was no satellite peak equivalent to that observed in M. domesticus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evolutionary divergence in satellite DNA sequences among Mus species was established by several investigators by comparing the patterns of buoyant density families that could be separated by genomic DNA and by analyzing the hybridization kinetics of satellite DNA hybrids using genomic DNA and separated satellites from different Mus species (Rice and Straus 1973;Sutton and McCallum 1972). More recently, the analysis of M. spretus genomic DNA with labeled "musculus" satellite DNA indicated a marked reduction in the relative abundance of major satellite sequences (Brown and Dover 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%