2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.558983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Related Party Transactions: Associations with Corporate Governance and Firm Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
133
4
25

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
13
133
4
25
Order By: Relevance
“…A study also found that companies with weaker corporate governance mechanism have more and higher RPT which imply agency problem between managers and shareholders [6]. Those with better mechanism have less and lower RPT which imply that corporate governance is important in deterring manipulation through RPT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A study also found that companies with weaker corporate governance mechanism have more and higher RPT which imply agency problem between managers and shareholders [6]. Those with better mechanism have less and lower RPT which imply that corporate governance is important in deterring manipulation through RPT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there is no empirical research on whether and how internal control has any impact on related party transactions, especially in CSOEs, although some papers study the relationship between corporate governance and related party transactions. Corporate governance has direct effects on related party transactions (Kohlbeck and Mayhew 2004), and weaker corporate governance mechanisms are associated with more and higher dollar amounts of related party transactions (Gordon et al 2004). The quality of corporate governance is important in deterring the use of manipulated transfer prices in relatedparty sales transactions (Lo et al 2010).…”
Section: Internal Control and Related Party Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the influence power of these stakeholders in CSOEs, related party transactions attract more attention from researchers and regulatory entities than unrelated party transactions. Fair related party transactions have arm-length prices and normal business processes, which efficiently fulfil underlying economic needs of the company (Gordon et al 2004). However, unfair related party transactions under a weak governance system with agency conflicts are often used to transfer wealth for private benefits of related parties (Chen and Wang 2005;Cheung et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table III, Panel A, shows that related party transactions appear across large-, medium-, and small-size firms, and that Purchase and Loans are the most frequent types of related party transactions among our sample firms. Our definition of the different types of related party transactions follows that of Gordon, Henry, and Palia (2004). "Sales" comprises sales of company assets or goods to a related party such as the management or the board.…”
Section: A Insider Trading and Financial Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Loans" comprises company loans to management or directors. Table III, Panel B, shows that the average market capitalization of firms that engage in related party transactions is $6.6 billion at the end of fiscal Gordon, Henry, and Palia (2004) and divide related party transactions into four categories. "Sales" comprises sales of company assets or goods to a related party such as the management or the board.…”
Section: A Insider Trading and Financial Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%